The Trash Heap of the Heapers' Hangout

1270327042706270827097762

Comments

  • i have emailed my mom requesting lentil soup~



    eeeeeee
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”

    I found it surprising too, for some reason

    I find it surprising, but not shocking.

    Honestly, Mojave having a beard surprised me more for some reason.
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”


    Compare/contrast.
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    uguu~
  • i am sad that i cannot see youtube
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    Naney said:

    i am sad that i cannot see youtube

    As am I. I think that you would find my last post rather intriguing.
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    OH MY GOD THIS IS THE BEST VIDEO EVER


  • edited 2013-04-22 11:34:29

    In the sequence of cultural evolution the emergence of a leisure class
    coincides with the beginning of ownership. This is necessarily the case,
    for these two institutions result from the same set of economic forces.
    In the inchoate phase of their development they are but different
    aspects of the same general facts of social structure.

    It is as elements of social structure--conventional facts--that leisure
    and ownership are matters of interest for the purpose in hand. A
    habitual neglect of work does not constitute a leisure class; neither
    does the mechanical fact of use and consumption constitute ownership.
    The present inquiry, therefore, is not concerned with the beginning
    of indolence, nor with the beginning of the appropriation of useful
    articles to individual consumption. The point in question is the origin
    and nature of a conventional leisure class on the one hand and the
    beginnings of individual ownership as a conventional right or equitable
    claim on the other hand.
  • The early differentiation out of which the distinction between a leisure
    and a working class arises is a division maintained between men's and
    women's work in the lower stages of barbarism. Likewise the earliest
    form of ownership is an ownership of the women by the able bodied men
    of the community. The facts may be expressed in more general terms, and
    truer to the import of the barbarian theory of life, by saying that it
    is an ownership of the woman by the man.

    There was undoubtedly some appropriation of useful articles before the
    custom of appropriating women arose. The usages of existing archaic
    communities in which there is no ownership of women is warrant for such
    a view. In all communities the members, both male and female, habitually
    appropriate to their individual use a variety of useful things; but
    these useful things are not thought of as owned by the person who
    appropriates and consumes them. The habitual appropriation and
    consumption of certain slight personal effects goes on without
    raising the question of ownership; that is to say, the question of a
    conventional, equitable claim to extraneous things.
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    So, conventional definitions of "property" and institutional sexism as intertwined systems. That's an interesting assertion.
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    OH MAN THIS IS EVEN BETTER


  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    You're terrible, Imi. Worse than me.
  • So, conventional definitions of "property" and institutional sexism as intertwined systems. That's an interesting assertion.
    yeah


    later on in the book he points out that in many cultures women in upper classes signify their status via things, like foot binding and ridiculous high maintenence fashion and corsets and whatnot, that render them unable to work, essentially saying "we are so well off that we can have members of the household that are literally incapable of work"


    Thorstein Veblen was an insightful dude.
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    I'm the worst
  • The ownership of women begins in the lower barbarian stages of culture,
    apparently with the seizure of female captives. The original reason
    for the seizure and appropriation of women seems to have been their
    usefulness as trophies. The practice of seizing women from the enemy
    as trophies, gave rise to a form of ownership-marriage, resulting in a
    household with a male head. This was followed by an extension of slavery
    to other captives and inferiors, besides women, and by an extension of
    ownership-marriage to other women than those seized from the enemy.
    The outcome of emulation under the circumstances of a predatory life,
    therefore, has been on the one hand a form of marriage resting on
    coercion, and on the other hand the custom of ownership. The two
    institutions are not distinguishable in the initial phase of their
    development; both arise from the desire of the successful men to put
    their prowess in evidence by exhibiting some durable result of their
    exploits. Both also minister to that propensity for mastery which
    pervades all predatory communities. From the ownership of women the
    concept of ownership extends itself to include the products of their
    industry, and so there arises the ownership of things as well as of
    persons.

    In this way a consistent system of property in goods is gradually
    installed. And although in the latest stages of the development,
    the serviceability of goods for consumption has come to be the most
    obtrusive element of their value, still, wealth has by no means yet lost
    its utility as a honorific evidence of the owner's prepotence.
  • Wherever the institution of private property is found, even in a
    slightly developed form, the economic process bears the character of a
    struggle between men for the possession of goods. It has been customary
    in economic theory, and especially among those economists who adhere
    with least faltering to the body of modernised classical doctrines, to
    construe this struggle for wealth as being substantially a struggle for
    subsistence. Such is, no doubt, its character in large part during
    the earlier and less efficient phases of industry. Such is also its
    character in all cases where the "niggardliness of nature" is so strict
    as to afford but a scanty livelihood to the community in return for
    strenuous and unremitting application to the business of getting the
    means of subsistence. But in all progressing communities an advance is
    presently made beyond this early stage of technological development.
    Industrial efficiency is presently carried to such a pitch as to afford
    something appreciably more than a bare livelihood to those engaged in
    the industrial process. It has not been unusual for economic theory to
    speak of the further struggle for wealth on this new industrial basis as
    a competition for an increase of the comforts of life,--primarily for
    an increase of the physical comforts which the consumption of goods
    affords.

    The end of acquisition and accumulation is conventionally held to be the
    consumption of the goods accumulated--whether it is consumption directly
    by the owner of the goods or by the household attached to him and for
    this purpose identified with him in theory. This is at least felt to
    be the economically legitimate end of acquisition, which alone it is
    incumbent on the theory to take account of. Such consumption may of
    course be conceived to serve the consumer's physical wants--his
    physical comfort--or his so-called higher wants--spiritual, aesthetic,
    intellectual, or what not; the latter class of wants being served
    indirectly by an expenditure of goods, after the fashion familiar to all
    economic readers.
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    So, conventional definitions of "property" and institutional sexism as intertwined systems. That's an interesting assertion.
    yeah


    later on in the book he points out that in many cultures women in upper classes signify their status via things, like foot binding and ridiculous high maintenence fashion and corsets and whatnot, that render them unable to work, essentially saying "we are so well off that we can have members of the household that are literally incapable of work"


    Thorstein Veblen was an insightful dude.
    I really should read that book in your sig. I had heard about it before, but now that I'm reading excerpts from it, I'm really intrigued.

    *...*

    You've really moved to the left over the past few years.
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    one thing I used to sometimes think about is the concept of "property" and how it's kinda weird and whether a society could exist that did not have it

    this went nowhere
  • eh, not really


    i just felt annoyed not running into any conservatives online so i decided to try being one for a while



    ah, the infinite flexibility of online life
  • edited 2013-04-22 11:52:52

    that said a lot of the libertarian stuff i looked into rubbed off on me, I'm still a big fan of P.J. O'Rourke and have a subscription to the Cato institute newsletter and whatnot
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    Naney said:

    eh, not really



    i just felt annoyed not running into any conservatives online so i decided to try being one for a while



    ah, the infinite flexibility of online life
    You are a strange and contrary person.

    I love that.
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    Naney said:

    that said a lot of the libertarian stuff i looked into rubbed off on me, I'm still a big fan of P.J. O'Rourke and have a subscription to the Cato institute newsletter and whatnot

    I like O'Rourke, actually. He has principles and actually thinks them through. Also, while I find many of the Cato Institute's economic views unsettling, their social positions are pretty sound.

    Plus, it's nice to hear someone argue a point that you don't agree with in a way that you can respect.
  • edited 2013-04-22 12:29:34

    I swear i'll run away from every home I ever have

    So i'll build a new house in every town i pass.
    Maybe then I won't always feel lost and trapped.
    When I was growing up, i was the smartest kid i knew.
    Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids.

    All I know is now I feel the opposite.

    Like if you dont want to work, then that becomes your job.
    Theres a lot of overtime, theres not many days off.
    I hope you know that I'm not trying to complain.
    It just gets hard to explain to people that I know, or kids who come to shows
    that I just dont want to talk about the office today.

    'Cause i've watched friends go from being pessimists to work at home archeologists
    they dig skin deep, they work every day
    i'm burying their arms for a vein or two that maybe they forgot.


    And the cops say its a crime for people like me and those friends of mine to want to die
    like my neighbor in St. Pete
    she's been on house arrest down here
    if she tries to leave her yard they'll lock her in a cage for years.
    cause sometimes she wants to die.
    and she shoots dope when she thinks she could die
    and the law they caught her one too many times
    shootin dope when she felt like she could die.

    We're building a new world, all of my friends and me
    its not an exact science yet, but we have the technology.
    now all we need is an economy where everybody finally will get enough to eat, even the suburbs
    know power's getting too crooked to stand on its own feet for much longer than it has.

    So i dont want to kill a cop, 

    what i want is neighborhoods where they don't have to get called when the shit goes down

    cause our friends, they are enough, and our neighbors have enough.

    finally we're enough.

    cause our friends, they are enough.
    and our neighbors are enough.
    and finally we're enough
    please help me be enough.


    fuck the law cause we're enough
    fuck the boss cause we're enough
    fuck microsoft cause we're enough
    fuck owning stocks cause we're enough
    fuck you cause we're enough
    fuck moving to brooklyn cause we're enough
    fuck the clash cause we're enough
    fuck martial stacks cause we're enough
    quit what you don't love cause we're enough
    live as you make it up cause we're enough
    you'll never go without cause we're enough
    we'll buy a house cause we're enough
    we'll grow some food cause we're enough
    we'll slam some dunks cause we're enough
    don't be afraid cause we're enough
    you'll always be ok because we'll always be enough.
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
    I need to find more ways to stick it to the man
  • i recommend finding men and poking them with sticks
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    Fun fact: When you call someone a prick, it is actually not the same as calling them a dick, but rather comparing them to a cattle prod.
  • I found it surprising too, for some reason

    I find it surprising, but not shocking.

    Honestly, Mojave having a beard surprised me more for some reason.
    Wait...he has a beard?

    I always thought Mojave Music was a stereotypical clean-shaven white nerd who just happened to be in the middle of the Bible Belt. 
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    Acererak said:

    I found it surprising too, for some reason

    I find it surprising, but not shocking.

    Honestly, Mojave having a beard surprised me more for some reason.
    Wait...he has a beard?

    I always thought Mojave Music was a stereotypical clean-shaven white nerd who just happened to be in the middle of the Bible Belt. 
    Not the middle of the Bible Belt, strictly speaking, just the hickish part of Pennsylvania.

    He's actually only an hour or two away from me, if I'm not mistaken...
  • I actually keep a list of your ethnicities in my head. Here's what I've got so far (feel free to correct me!)

    White
    • Mojave Music
    • glennmagusharvey
    • Viani
    • JHM
    • Naney
    • spinor
    Black
    • Tre
    • Anonus
    • CA
    • Yarrun
    Asian
    • Kraken
    Hispanic
    • myself
    • Cynicalclock
  • edited 2013-04-22 13:14:31
    ...And even when your hope is gone
    move along, move along, just to make it through
    (2015 self)
    So, some people have talked about whether or not Napoleon Bonaparte was short.  See, there's the whole thing about him being less than five feet; but the french foot was apparently bigger than the English foot; but the length of a foot has been changed dozens of times, and Napoleon lived before standardized measurements; so basically the measurements are no help and all we have is pictures of him.

    And, just our luck, people of the turn of the century had no good idea of perspective.  I mean, just look at the ruins that decorate Gibbon's Rise And Fall Of The Roman Empire.  Either the arches are big enough to fly a blimp through; or the people are all really tiny.  I mean, the pictures of street scenes in Napoleon's time had the same thing; either over-sized streets and buildings or undersized people.

    image

    So, all we have to go in is what people said about Napoleon.  And what they said was that he was a rather short guy.

    ^ Alligator is my ethnicity.  As far as humanizations of myself go, I'm not saying.
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    I am half white, half Native American, and all mindscrew
  • We can do anything if we do it together.
    I'm another one for the "white" column.
  • You know, I've kind of made it a thing to examine the metaphysical aspects of certain "mentalities" to see if it there exists enough of a knowledge or awareness of it to turn a profit from it. So long as we exist in the mental state that effort and work would be equivalent to metaphysical currency, I would take great care as to know exactly what type of things could draw in this money, and exactly what kind of power they had about them to do such a thing.

    Thus have I vowed never to speak lightly or freely of fandoms so long as the thing in question had the power to draw in money. Let be known that I don't actually dislike fans of Twilight: The book series, I merely find the whole experience something akin to going to a fancy restaurant and being served an ordinary ham and cheese on white bread sandwich.
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
    There's only one thing that I know how to do well
    And I've often been told that you only do
    What you know how to do well
    And that's be you
    Be what you're like
    Be like yourself
    So I'm having a wonderful time
    But I'd rather be whistling in the dark
  • For record's sake, I'm white, though my father is Filipino.
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
    I'm biracial but I look white for the most part.

    Well, except my facial features, and the texture of my hair.
  • I am white with a couple distant relatives who are either Japanese or Jewish depending where on the clusterfuck that is our family tree you look.
  • i did it


    i got soup
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    yay soup
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    My mother is white, my father is black
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
    And you're the color of a delicious chocolate milkshake~
  • The sadness will last forever.
    I'm asian and have ancestors that are white.
  • There's only one thing that I know how to do well

    And I've often been told that you only do
    What you know how to do well
    And that's be you
    Be what you're like
    Be like yourself
    So I'm having a wonderful time
    But I'd rather be whistling in the dark
    Huh. I didn't know you were into TMBG.
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    everyone's a mutt
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    Yarrun said:


    There's only one thing that I know how to do well

    And I've often been told that you only do
    What you know how to do well
    And that's be you
    Be what you're like
    Be like yourself
    So I'm having a wonderful time
    But I'd rather be whistling in the dark
    Huh. I didn't know you were into TMBG.
    Doesn't she talk about them fairly often though
  • edited 2013-04-22 16:20:53
    We can do anything if we do it together.
    Anonus said:

    Yarrun said:


    There's only one thing that I know how to do well

    And I've often been told that you only do
    What you know how to do well
    And that's be you
    Be what you're like
    Be like yourself
    So I'm having a wonderful time
    But I'd rather be whistling in the dark
    Huh. I didn't know you were into TMBG.
    Doesn't she talk about them fairly often though
    I helped get her further into TMBG than she already was.
Sign In or Register to comment.