i'm a little bitter i guess, it was one of those aspects of my speech that made me sound different from my classmates at school, so other children would make jokes about it
with accent stuff, i tended to mimic the other kids in an effort to fit in, but 'haitch' was just wrong, so i got stubborn about it
why, when you click to close a non-responsive program, do you then get a loading bar and a 'checking for a solution' message, instead of the program just, y'know, closing?
why, when you click to close a non-responsive program, do you then get a loading bar and a 'checking for a solution' message, instead of the program just, y'know, closing?
on Windows 7
ive always kinda presumed that sometimes it will actually find a solution and recover the program, but i've literally never seen it happen soooo
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
It's not just Windows 7; 8.1 and 10 do it too. And...yeah, I don't know. I wondered about that too.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
It's attempting to self-diagnose the problem by comparing data collected from the crash/malfunction with known error data on a Microsoft server. If the developer/distributor of the software has made a point of coordinating with MSDN, there's a chance that this will be able to identify frequently-mentioned errors, and direct users with a known issue to a solution. However, given the vast range of potential errors in the wild, the automatic bug-fixing system doesn't work terribly well.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Earlier today I ended up in this weird state where I was awake but dreaming as if I were asleep.
It was really weird, the situations I was in felt so real, but then I would snap back to reality and realize I was all alone in my bedroom...
And I notice that which people count as mllennials seems to be slipping, too. Are people just a bit younger than me millennials? Are people still in high school now millennials? Does anyone even know?
I honestly thought, before it became a buzzword, that a millennial was someone born after the year 2000 (ie. in the new millenium). So my younger brother (who is 13) would be one but I wouldn't be.
But idk, I have no idea anymore. I've seen it applied to people older than I am (in some cases a good 5-6 years older).
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Star Trek: In the 20th century, the page-naming curse was fairly consistent (to the point where Insurrection's crew made a point of calling the film "Nine of Ten" on set to stave off the odd number's influence, not that it helped). But this century the Curse seems to have gone off the rails — 2002's Star Trek: Nemesis flopped while 2009's Star Trek was a hit, contrary to their positions in the series. It is unknown whether this anomaly means the curse has actually been broken, or merely inverted.
Among those who do consider 10 bad and 11 good, there are several commonly proposed methods to realign the curse with "reality". One is using the sum of the digits as an indicator (10; 1+0=1, an odd number and 11; 1+1=2, an even number), or alternatively including the Affectionate ParodyGalaxy Quest as a "Star Trek movie", inserting it between 9 (Insurrection) and 10 (Nemesis) as put bySam Hughes. Another theory states that Nemesis wasn't good because it was a multiple of five, and thus, like Star Trek V, was bad; in other words, the curse has a previously-undiscovered FizzBuzz property. This is followed by the explanation that Star Trek doesn't follow the pattern because of the interference of time-traveling Romulans — besides, it wasn't made by the same crew as the rest. Some have also taken to referring the reboot film as "Star Trek 0," thus placing it in an arguably even spot.
The following film, Star Trek Into Darkness, muddies the waters even further; it was successful critically and financially, but created a Broken Base among fans. Some still maintain the curse is now inverted as they felt Into Darkness wasn't as fresh as the 2009 reboot.
Comments
with accent stuff, i tended to mimic the other kids in an effort to fit in, but 'haitch' was just wrong, so i got stubborn about it
(this is completely arbitrary)
zed's dead
A
I
T
C
H
Woodlice. They are cute.
And mostly benign, since they feed on rotten material and rarely harm living plants.
why, when you click to close a non-responsive program, do you then get a loading bar and a 'checking for a solution' message, instead of the program just, y'know, closing?
on Windows 7
and whenever i've clicked that it's always been from a standpoint of, fine, i give up, just close it already
Doesn't matter anyway, since I am not a preprogrammed zombie
If this amounts to me saying something positive about TV then...so be it.
crew made a point of calling the film "Nine of Ten" on set to stave off
the odd number's influence, not that it helped). But this century the
Curse seems to have gone off the rails — 2002's Star Trek: Nemesis flopped while 2009's Star Trek
was a hit, contrary to their positions in the series. It is unknown
whether this anomaly means the curse has actually been broken, or merely
inverted.
good, there are several commonly proposed methods to realign the curse
with "reality". One is using the sum of the digits as an indicator (10; 1+0=1, an odd number and 11; 1+1=2, an even number), or alternatively including the Affectionate Parody Galaxy Quest as a "Star Trek movie", inserting it between 9 (Insurrection) and 10 (Nemesis) as put by
doesn't follow the pattern because of the interference of
time-traveling Romulans — besides, it wasn't made by the same crew as
the rest. Some have also taken to referring the reboot film as "Star Trek 0," thus placing it in an arguably even spot.
“If my mind can conceive it, and my heart can believe it—then I can achieve it."
RIP.
FUUUUUUUUUCK YOU