A BLEND OF APPLE, PEAR, GRAPE, AND PINEAPPLE JUICES FROM CONCENTRATE AND OTHER INGREDIENTS.
CONTAINS APPLE, PEAR AND GRAPE JUICES FROM CONCENTRATE, LESS THAN 2% OF: PINEAPPLE JUICE FROM CONCENTRATE, NATURAL FLAVORS, CALCIUM CITRATE (CALCIUM SOURCE) VITAMIN C (ASCORBIC ACID), CITRIC ACID (PROVIDES TARTNESS), POTASSIUM PHOSPHATE
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Really the Land of Ooo seems to be FULL of principalities
I guess technically I am a Christian, in the "was drowned in a basin of holy water and went to a CoE school for seven years" sense.
If nothing else, I'll concede to "some 2000 years ago there was a middle-eastern prophet/preacher called Jesus who extolled the virtues of a monotheistic religion".
I guess technically I am a Christian, in the "was drowned in a basin of holy water and went to a CoE school for seven years" sense.
If nothing else, I'll concede to "some 2000 years ago there was a middle-eastern prophet/preacher called Jesus who extolled the virtues of a monotheistic religion".
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
I'm tempted to do a "One Week of IE Challenge" where I use nothing but the most recent release of Internet Explorer for a week
I'm listening to Crash Course Literature at work, and it reminded me of one of the weirdest criticisms of CC World History that I've seen. Apparently, John talks about sex too much and uses too many bad words...because, you know, a high-school/college-level series about world history is eminently appropriate for grade schoolers because it's "educational". :P
I've also heard people say he talks too fast, but that's a problem with lectures in general. My mom used to bring a microcassette recorder to class with her when she was in college to remedy that problem, and with YouTube videos, you could always just run the tape back until you get it.
Even people who pull wacky stunts where they follow all of Leviticus for a year are ignoring theological points about Christ freeing humanity from strict religious law.
As for religion, I was nominally raised Methodist at first, converted to LDS in 1988, and then left LDS in 1997 because I found it stifling. I don't really believe in anything in particular now, though I'm not antagonistic to religion like a lot of rationalists seem to be (this means you, Dawkins).
But is this a negation of believing something, or are you using a noun to say you believe in nothing? Is it Hegel or Heidegger's, or even the crude antinatalist nothing?
Yeah, the literature series didn't go as deep as it probably should have...not sure why. There's several books he could have delved into and didn't, for one.
i identify as a Methodist Christian, but when i talk to other Christians at any length about religion it quickly becomes apparent we're not really on the same page about very much
Yeah, the literature series didn't go as deep as it probably should have...not sure why. There's several books he could have delved into and didn't, for one.
it was more a question of the depth with which he tackled the material he tackled
i know it's a 'crash course' but he raises zero theoretical concerns and just dives straight into the books
it gives you a very misleading and outdated impression of what literary studies is about
That and it doesn't quite follow the pattern of the English and US lit classes I took in high school...we started English Lit at the beginning, Beowulf, and went from there through Chaucer and all to Shakespeare and de Maupassant.
But is this a negation of believing something, or are you using a noun to say you believe in nothing? Is it Hegel or Heidegger's, or even the crude antinatalist nothing?
Does nothing noth?
I am almost completely uninitiated with philosophy but I see everything as ultimately meaningless and temporary. This comforts me.
Comments
I AM UNGROUNDABLE
SUCK IT AUTHORITY FIGURES
*screams BOLLOCKS as loud as possible*
*kicked out of the building*
"The year 1997 has arrived. A herd of fuckin' ugly reds. are rushing from the mainland."
I BRING YOU
If nothing else, I'll concede to "some 2000 years ago there was a middle-eastern prophet/preacher called Jesus who extolled the virtues of a monotheistic religion".
i got confirmed too early, i think
then again, that could backfire horribly
Because I'm a masochistic little princess
well tachy
do you believe in the Christian religion?
should be fun
i do believe in something
well i mean you can still identify with the religion without interpreting it all literalllythen again, i guess that's fair enough if the target audience is GCSE level or under
in the middle of band class
i hope you like it
i know it's a 'crash course' but he raises zero theoretical concerns and just dives straight into the books
it gives you a very misleading and outdated impression of what literary studies is about
it's just not the be-all-end-all
There is no way out of here.