More people have said that and been killed than there are thorium decay products.
I was being serious yknow, but people are all like "miko you are such a sarcastic thread shitting passive aggressive bitch and all the stuff you say is elitist and inconsiderate!!!!!" Do they really mean it, or are they jealous of my "special snowflake" status? :o
i don't really care if you want to talk about arcade games here, go for it if you really want to, but there are already a whole bunch of gaming related threads and to my mind that's not really a sport
I guess I am sort of torn on sports if it makes sense to say that. On one hand I think they can be rather entertaining sometimes and they give me something to talk about with people with whom I otherwise do not have much in common. On the other hand, I feel like it can be a bit weird to care about them when you lack any kind of athletic ability. Plus, some aspects of sports and sports culture seem actively harmful (e.g., brain damage from concussions, hooliganism, super macho locker room behavior as evidenced by that whole mess with Jonathan Martin) and I worry that being a fan indirectly contributes to those negative parts of sport.
I listen to sports radio here, but then I find people complaining about the local sports teams entertaining. (It's certainly better than right-wing claptrap, or WTOP and WNEW repeating the same half-dozen stories ad nauseam).
The Mysterious Ballerina and her Tree Stump Ghosts
I've been following the world cup, it's actually kinda annoying how little information is easy to come by compared to the men's equivalent. I don't even ask for much!
this might be of interest to people as it is a football tournament which the USA has a good chance of winning
I actually think most Americans are more likely to know who Mia Hamm is than any male soccer player who has played Team USA, so women's soccer has had an impact here, for sure. Apparently, the games have been getting better TV ratings than they usually do this world cup. I am not sure if that is mostly because of increased interest or because matches tend to be on during better times this year due to the time zones matching up.
Speaking of the women's world cup, I find it kind of odd how the BBC labels women's teams on their site so differently than men's teams. They seem to consistently call the women's teams "USA Women," "England Women," "Canada Women," "Colombia Women" and such in tables and match reports whereas the men's teams are just "USA," "England," "Canada," and "Colombia." I get that the men's competitions are often considered more prestigious, but it is not like women represent their country worse than men do and I feel like it is usually not all that difficult to figure out whether the teams are men's or women's ones from the context. Fox Sports does not seem to do that unequal labeling over here, I wonder why the BBC chooses to do it.
this might be of interest to people as it is a football tournament which the USA has a good chance of winning
Speaking of the women's world cup, I find it kind of odd how the BBC labels women's teams on their site so differently than men's teams. They seem to consistently call the women's teams "USA Women," "England Women," "Canada Women," "Colombia Women" and such in tables and match reports whereas the men's teams are just "USA," "England," "Canada," and "Colombia." I get that the men's competitions are often considered more prestigious, but it is not like women represent their country worse than men do and I feel like it is usually not all that difficult to figure out whether the teams are men's or women's ones from the context. Fox Sports does not seem to do that unequal labeling over here, I wonder why the BBC chooses to do it.
This is very common in the UK media in general, yeah. It probably has something to do with how ubiquitous the mens teams are in common usage in the UK, whereas in the US even mens soccer isn't as big, comparatively, so its possible there's less chance of confusion? Not sure, is it more common to use the term 'mens teams' in the US? I don't think that happens here at all, except when we're specifically talking about both mens and womens teams
I think it's good how far coverage of womens football has come in the past few years, but there's still a lot of room for improvement
Also I just realised I used two different words for the same sport in this post
this might be of interest to people as it is a football tournament which the USA has a good chance of winning
I actually think most Americans are more likely to know who Mia Hamm is than any male soccer player who has played Team USA, so women's soccer has had an impact here, for sure.
Comments
i don't really care if you want to talk about arcade games here, go for it if you really want to, but there are already a whole bunch of gaming related threads and to my mind that's not really a sport
i'd much rather you posted about competitive arcade games than have this argument
ouch, Marcelo
but yeah if people wanna discuss the cardinals hacking controversy i think here is an ok place for it
the Astros' general manager, John Luhnow, used to work for the Cardinals
the suggestion is they were worried he was giving information about them to the Astros, but that doesn't explain the leak
this might be of interest to people as it is a football tournament which the USA has a good chance of winning
(I'm like 70% certain I've stolen this joke from somewhere but I have no idea where)
that took me a moment
always nice to see an England victory
could have done without that last minute obviously
I was watching! Although I only caught the second half, so the only goal I saw was, um, Colombia's
generally, i mean, it was more positive, i don't just mean the goals
Also: i am not a cricket-following person but apparently it has been a good day for England!
Speaking of the women's world cup, I find it kind of odd how the BBC labels women's teams on their site so differently than men's teams. They seem to consistently call the women's teams "USA Women," "England Women," "Canada Women," "Colombia Women" and such in tables and match reports whereas the men's teams are just "USA," "England," "Canada," and "Colombia." I get that the men's competitions are often considered more prestigious, but it is not like women represent their country worse than men do and I feel like it is usually not all that difficult to figure out whether the teams are men's or women's ones from the context. Fox Sports does not seem to do that unequal labeling over here, I wonder why the BBC chooses to do it.
I think it's good how far coverage of womens football has come in the past few years, but there's still a lot of room for improvement
Also I just realised I used two different words for the same sport in this post