You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
aww, that sucks.
I deliberately went with some "gender-neutral" glasses for my current pair, because...you know...
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
I prefer neither dichotomy, since those types of critiques never give any room for what goes on in-between, and it's a pretty lazy way of looking at movies anyway. Even the "bad" stuff, before you start accounting for subjective tastes, have their own little nuances; and once you start getting into an trying to argue what you see, it gets even better.
So, what's up with all these historians acting like all of England's royalty that died-without-having-any-children must have been homosexual. I seriously can't see Eadward the Confessor as homosexual, and Richard I was an incorrigible womanizer (and really, of all the things Richard's enemies said about him; they never accused him of being attracted to men (NOTE: their homophobia/biphobia does necessarily not reflect my views)). Also, really, Henry Benedict Stuart?
I don't have a problem with a king of England being homosexual; but when your only evidence is that he had no children; that's kind of lame.
Also, it's another annoying reminder of how the world likes to forget that aces exist.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Richard I was an incorrigible womanizer (and really, of all the things Richard's enemies said about him; they never accused him of being attracted to men (NOTE: their homophobia/biphobia does necessarily not reflect my views)).
There are plenty of indications that Richard II was quite fond of both sexes, albeit quieter about being interested in men for obvious reasons. And yes, his opponents (and some of his allies) made plenty of allusions to this.
I do agree, however, that not having children does not mean that they were homosexual. But nor does having children mean that one was not interested in the same sex.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
in my EU4 game, the king of France has "FitzGerald" as a last name (presumably transliterated into french as something like "de Geraud", but still). He's a relative of the kings of Ireland, which until recently in this game existed as a unified and independent country before it was conquered by Frederick-William of Britain.
Comments
Assassin poems, Poems that shoot
guns. Poems that wrestle cops into alleys
and take their weapons leaving them dead
i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
I don't have a problem with a king of England being homosexual; but when
your only evidence is that he had no children; that's kind of lame.
Also, it's another annoying reminder of how the world likes to forget that aces exist.
exegesis, inchoate, intestate, contumely, wastrel, indemnity, flummox, preponderous, vacillate, colloquy, allay, collusion, execration, diapason, largesse, pilloried, modality, mulct, plenipotentiary, olio, palliasse, contretemps, poliorcetics, vitiate, bivouac, otiose, peripatetic, adumbrating, cyclothymia, and appanage.
All words.
All of the vocabulary words I posted, from "fillip" to "nonfeasance" are in Frank McLynn's Richard and John kings at war.
And also many more great words.
so
much
math
homework