where X and Y are functionally nouns M and N are functionally adjectives and M X, M Y, N X, and N Y are all true for some subsets of X and Y, at least from the speaker's perspective.
* the flamewarrior - most likely to perpetuate an argument. doesn't usually start one, but frequently participates. probably this gives 'em something to do. * the random stuff poster - doesn't care about others interest, and indulges their own. not much of an arguer type. more whimsical; leaves when drama happens. * the nonsense spammer - the posts look insane, and the person probably really wants to get something out 'eir system and doesn't really know what it is. sometimes they're just letting off steam. may be able to end arguments by filibustering them with nonsense. * the baiter - most likely to piss people off and to start arguments. probably enjoys trolling. the bane of mods. * the clown - is here for the sake of humor. most likely to crack puns. relatively popular because 'ey give people a good laugh. * the matter-of-fact - tries to actually talk about stuff. probably polite to people. most likely to suffer the fate of being appointed moderator.
TX-01: With Michele Bachmann gone from the House, we’re pretty much left with Louie Gohmert as the House Republican who’s most likely to say something that would be considered inflammatory if it weren’t so incoherent. And while he’s in a district in rural east Texas that’s so red as to insulate him against Democrats no matter what he says, he may now be facing someone who’s not just casting aspersions on his asparagus, but may actually be in a position to do some damage.
Rancher Simon Winston is running against Gohmert in the Republican primary, which, believe it or not, is just 34 days away ... and it turns out that Winston is capable of some significant self-funding: he just loaned his campaign $305,000. (H/t to reporter Greg Giroux, who’s better at unearthing these tidbits than anyone else.)
That leaves Gohmert with only $178,000 cash on hand, compared with $302,000 for Winston, and hardly any time for Gohmert to call around and raise more funds. Can’t Gohmert just pull out his own checkbook and make up the difference, though? No … as a prime example of the financial discipline that Republicans are known for, Gohmert has a net worth of negative $370,000. (Gohmert, of course, still has the advantage of name recognition that comes with incumbency, so Winston still has to be facing a steep uphill fight.)
Winston’s angle doesn’t seem to be running to Gohmert’s left (which wouldn’t work well in this district) or his right (not much room there), as simply from the less-crazy. He explains on his campaign website:
But like many of you, I’m frustrated that Congress has become such a circus, and that our representative Louie Gohmert is one of the main clowns…. I’m not going to promote myself while ignoring our district, nor will I embarrass the Republican Party or East Texas. I’ll simply fight every day for the issues and values that are important to East Texas, and work hard to get things done.
i say what what, in the fuck i say what what, in the fuck i say what what, in the fuck i say what what, in the fuck you want to do what in my fuck, in my fuck you want to do what in my fuck, in my fuck you want to do what in my fuck, in my fuck let's do it in the fuck, O.K.! it's okay if you have a little fight do you want me i want, i, not have heart
thus it is concluded that the song is about hatesex with someone who is suicidal
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
"Limited government" or "small government" is not an inherently noble ideal
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
it's all about casting this pall of dark dreariness over everything
sure, the teenagers are all into the gratuitous sex and violence, but then after that, you just get jadedness, and increasingly looking into weirdo psychological bullshit, with edgy social power plays, dangerous sexual encounters, depressing gritty crap, and attempting to portray oneself as a high-class git by spending too much money on things that don't even provide a profound sense of pleasurable satisfaction
Unused line from the safety portion of my directing today's lab sessions:
"The shower is over there. It might be a bit messy -- heck, it WILL be messy. But when you are on fire, being not messy is less important than being not on fire."
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You can't call something a deconstruction when you don't know what it deconstructs.
I don't know what it deconstructs.
Therefore, I don't need to deal with the question of whether something is a deconstruction. When the question of whether a work is a deconstruction is posed to me, I can simply ignore it.
You can't call something a deconstruction when you don't know what it deconstructs.
I don't know what it deconstructs.
Therefore, I don't need to deal with the question of whether something is a deconstruction. When the question of whether a work is a deconstruction is posed to me, I can simply ignore it.
You can't call something a deconstruction when you don't know what it deconstructs.
I don't know what it deconstructs.
Therefore, I don't need to deal with the question of whether something is a deconstruction. When the question of whether a work is a deconstruction is posed to me, I can simply ignore it.
You can't call something a deconstruction when you don't know what it deconstructs.
I don't know what it deconstructs.
Therefore, I don't need to deal with the question of whether something is a deconstruction. When the question of whether a work is a deconstruction is posed to me, I can simply ignore it.
my joke was that like if you know anything at all about Derrida you know he wrote deconstructions, whether or not you know what he deconstructed. i was being pedantic, obviously that's not the kind of situation you had in mind.
i don't really see anything wrong with your statement, other than finding the purposeful ignorance it implies sort of sad
Comments
as are your posts
i agree that my taste is shit
your taste is shit, too
this is because everyone's taste is shit
no one's special
your mockery does not matter
the things we mock don't matter either
"I like my X like I like my Y: M and N."
where
X and Y are functionally nouns
M and N are functionally adjectives
and M X, M Y, N X, and N Y are all true for some subsets of X and Y, at least from the speaker's perspective.
* the flamewarrior - most likely to perpetuate an argument. doesn't usually start one, but frequently participates. probably this gives 'em something to do.
* the random stuff poster - doesn't care about others interest, and indulges their own. not much of an arguer type. more whimsical; leaves when drama happens.
* the nonsense spammer - the posts look insane, and the person probably really wants to get something out 'eir system and doesn't really know what it is. sometimes they're just letting off steam. may be able to end arguments by filibustering them with nonsense.
* the baiter - most likely to piss people off and to start arguments. probably enjoys trolling. the bane of mods.
* the clown - is here for the sake of humor. most likely to crack puns. relatively popular because 'ey give people a good laugh.
* the matter-of-fact - tries to actually talk about stuff. probably polite to people. most likely to suffer the fate of being appointed moderator.
Rancher Simon Winston is running against Gohmert in the Republican primary, which, believe it or not, is just 34 days away ... and it turns out that Winston is capable of some significant self-funding: he just loaned his campaign $305,000. (H/t to reporter Greg Giroux, who’s better at unearthing these tidbits than anyone else.)
That leaves Gohmert with only $178,000 cash on hand, compared with $302,000 for Winston, and hardly any time for Gohmert to call around and raise more funds. Can’t Gohmert just pull out his own checkbook and make up the difference, though? No … as a prime example of the financial discipline that Republicans are known for, Gohmert has a net worth of negative $370,000. (Gohmert, of course, still has the advantage of name recognition that comes with incumbency, so Winston still has to be facing a steep uphill fight.)
Winston’s angle doesn’t seem to be running to Gohmert’s left (which wouldn’t work well in this district) or his right (not much room there), as simply from the less-crazy. He explains on his campaign website:
source: http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/1/27/1473812/-Daily-Kos-Elections-Live-Digest-1-27
"what you're saying would be very offensive if it weren't so incoherent"
It's CHEESE. Do you really expect me to WASTE CHEESE? It's FUCKING DELICIOUS.
It's SHRIMP IN LOBSTER SAUCE. Do you really expect me to WASTE SHRIMP IN LOBSTER SAUCE? It's FUCKING DELICIOUS.
i say what what, in the fuck
i say what what, in the fuck
i say what what, in the fuck
i say what what, in the fuck
you want to do what in my fuck, in my fuck
you want to do what in my fuck, in my fuck
you want to do what in my fuck, in my fuck
let's do it in the fuck, O.K.!
it's okay if you have a little fight
do you want me
i want, i, not have heart
thus it is concluded that the song is about hatesex with someone who is suicidal
source:
No, shut up, go away, and let me enjoy my burrito and halva.
sure, the teenagers are all into the gratuitous sex and violence, but then after that, you just get jadedness, and increasingly looking into weirdo psychological bullshit, with edgy social power plays, dangerous sexual encounters, depressing gritty crap, and attempting to portray oneself as a high-class git by spending too much money on things that don't even provide a profound sense of pleasurable satisfaction
"The shower is over there. It might be a bit messy -- heck, it WILL be messy. But when you are on fire, being not messy is less important than being not on fire."
(i am not TAing polymer lab, FYI)
I don't know what it deconstructs.
Therefore, I don't need to deal with the question of whether something is a deconstruction. When the question of whether a work is a deconstruction is posed to me, I can simply ignore it.
┌∩┐TAKE THAT┌∩┐
:p
Serious response: Why wrong?
i don't really see anything wrong with your statement, other than finding the purposeful ignorance it implies sort of sad