oh and Muse who i sincerely loved from about 14-17 and they are very bad.
there's this tumblr post that goes like
(*downloads the mcdonalds font and writes "capitalism"*)
muse fan: oh my god oh mygodohmygod
im glad that i only really liked them during their cut-price radiohead period and went off them roughly at the same point they became a musical equivalent of russell brand
in some ways i feel lucky that i was dirt poor and had dial-up at that age so i could only listwn to ine song a day, taking like 6 hours to load a youtube video and playing it over and over
and also listening to sound clips on the listening stations at the bookstore
I actually saw Muse in concert a few years ago at the Staples Center in LA (probably 4 years ago?), but these were free tickets a friend was handing out. My impression? Great stage design and visuals, boring-as-hell forgettable music, singer who thinks he's hot and is wrong.
death grips is fun and dumb jump up and down and have a good time party music
like i can get not liking it but that comparison is weird
look you can't just say that
I can say that Muse is intelligent and sophisticated and cultured and Death Grips is dumb and loud, neither set of statements is more true than the other, you're just interpreting the actual sonic qualities of the music in a specific way. That's not the only way to look at the artists in question.
Also I'm pretty sure if you played Death Grips at....any kind of party? Certainly most parties. You'd get kicked out.
they are straightforward, direct, occasionally humorous, and fun! there isn't much in the way of attempts at grand, unifying ideals or commentary beyond the odd bit of punk-ish "fuck everything" attitude.
in terms of the music as a whole, there is a strong emphasis on memorable hooks, and the songs tend to stick within the 3-4 minute range. i will grant that the instrumentation is oftentimes ornate and weird, but it's no more so than say, Kate Bush can be at times.
i mean, you could call it pretentious if you wanted to, but any set of criteria that would lump them as pretentious would grab almost every band under the sun.
they are straightforward, direct, occasionally humorous, and fun! there isn't much in the way of attempts at grand, unifying ideals or commentary beyond the odd bit of punk-ish "fuck everything" attitude.
in terms of the music as a whole, there is a strong emphasis on memorable hooks, and the songs tend to stick within the 3-4 minute range. i will grant that the instrumentation is oftentimes ornate and weird, but it's no more so than say, Kate Bush can be at times.
i mean, you could call it pretentious if you wanted to, but any set of criteria that would lump them as pretentious would grab almost every band under the sun.
id type more but i gots a job interview in a sec
I think the difference between you and I is that you are living in a world where Kate Bush is evidently a pop princess.
Don't mind me, I'm just salty that someone earlier today told me I "must hate music" because I haven't listened to To Pimp a Butterfly yet.
they are straightforward, direct, occasionally humorous, and fun! there isn't much in the way of attempts at grand, unifying ideals or commentary beyond the odd bit of punk-ish "fuck everything" attitude.
in terms of the music as a whole, there is a strong emphasis on memorable hooks, and the songs tend to stick within the 3-4 minute range. i will grant that the instrumentation is oftentimes ornate and weird, but it's no more so than say, Kate Bush can be at times.
i mean, you could call it pretentious if you wanted to, but any set of criteria that would lump them as pretentious would grab almost every band under the sun.
id type more but i gots a job interview in a sec
I think the difference between you and I is that you are living in a world where Kate Bush is evidently a pop princess.
Don't mind me, I'm just salty that someone earlier today told me I "must hate music" because I haven't listened to To Pimp a Butterfly yet.
There is plenty of stuff that sells very well that the average person still doesn't know anything about.
Radiohead is another example.
Like, a Platinum album (the best Kate Bush has is double-platinum, which is impressive, don't get me wrong), indicates that 300,000 copies were sold (in the US it would indicate 1 million sold, the standards are different from place to place), double-platinum is about 600,000 copies.
However,
some googling indicates that there were 56 million people living in the United Kingdom in 1980.
Kate Bush is not on that list, but you know who is? Dido.
I have completely forgotten what point I was trying to make in the process of googling all this, but now you can tell your friends that you know what the best selling album in the UK ever was.
it was supposed to come out later this month but some intern put it up on iTunes early so TopDawg Entertainment just said "fuck it" collectively and released it early.
The same thing happened today with Earl Sweatshirt's new album except that one's not actually out yet. Stuff's weird.
Granted, this was in part because she hadn’t toured in 35 years, but it still shows that she could easily have toured to respectable audiences if she wanted to.
I doubt that Dido has any fans who will clamour to see her in concert at a place like the Hammersmith Apollo when she is the age that Kate Bush is now.
In the end, resonance and longevity are more remarkable than flash-in-the-pan popularity. That’s what separates the sales and concert attendance of Radiohead from the sales and concert attendance of Hanson (“MMMBop” was a big hit at the same time OK Computer topped the charts in the UK).
i have a weird nostalgic liking for this song bcos it reminds me of being 12 and in my dads car listeningto absolute radio on the way to, idk, scout group or the beach or something
tbf coldplay are all very skilled musicians (their drummer is insane) and have written some goood pop hooks it is a shame that they make the most cardboard uninteresting middle of road by numbers dadrock
like if coldplay went 'fuck it' and one day decided to release a deeply experimental noise-pop album i bet it would be fucking brilliant, however sadly they are busy rolling around in gold plated swimming pools full of money and naming their offspring after varieties of fruit
Comments
Though that might be Kenna, I dunno.
Do we just not have angsty white boys.
and also listening to sound clips on the listening stations at the bookstore
i just listened to this 20-30 second clip of Der Mussolini over and over
(The other Jane)
death grips is fun and dumb jump up and down and have a good time party music
like i can get not liking it but that comparison is weird
Alternates:
read the lyrics to a death grips song
any death grips song
they are straightforward, direct, occasionally humorous, and fun! there isn't much in the way of attempts at grand, unifying ideals or commentary beyond the odd bit of punk-ish "fuck everything" attitude.
in terms of the music as a whole, there is a strong emphasis on memorable hooks, and the songs tend to stick within the 3-4 minute range. i will grant that the instrumentation is oftentimes ornate and weird, but it's no more so than say, Kate Bush can be at times.
i mean, you could call it pretentious if you wanted to, but any set of criteria that would lump them as pretentious would grab almost every band under the sun.
id type more but i gots a job interview in a sec
The same thing happened today with Earl Sweatshirt's new album except that one's not actually out yet. Stuff's weird.
I doubt that Dido has any fans who will clamour to see her in concert at a place like the Hammersmith Apollo when she is the age that Kate Bush is now.
My angsty teen phase was mostly Soundgarden, who I still like.
Later I got into thrash metal, which I still like.
Basically I'm saying
tbf coldplay are all very skilled musicians (their drummer is insane) and have written some goood pop hooks it is a shame that they make the most cardboard uninteresting middle of road by numbers dadrock
Well, "Talk" is ok, but only because it steals its hook from a much better song.