I've never been able to find the real name of that thin sans-serif from the Selmur logo and the signs at Dulles Airport, but Stereo Gothic is a pretty close facsimile.
Update: The Dulles font isn't the same; it was originally drawn by Eero Saarinen (who designed the main terminal) and looks like a more square version of the Selmur font.
While I'm thinking about it, the font purists need to shove it. Everyone who made phototypesetters and laser printers back in the 1960s-1980s had knockoff fonts, and as long as the quality was good, who cares? I mean, if you insisted on using genuine Haas Helvetica and Monotype Times New Roman, I'm sure you could find hot-metal matrices for them someplace. :P
I wouldn't be so upset if they were concerned about shovelware vendors like SWFTE or Casady & Greene, but they also bash Bitstream, which is a bit like bashing IBM for ripping off both Apple and IMSAI. :P
I think it says something about me that as much as you're supposed to hate Comic Sans (since it's clearly innately horrible), I just can't. There are too many goofy, outside-the-box uses for it.
That said, there are some old display fonts that are gaudy, overdesigned horrors. No one seems to hate on them because they're just too obscure, it seems. (Do I detect font hipsters?)
Comic Sans is great for what it is, it's just not really suitable for everything people use it for.
Also, it's an outgrowth of Mac vs PC snobbery. You don't see them yelling at Marker Felt, which is pretty much Apple's version of Comic Sans.
I also agree with you that a lot of it is simply hipsterism; "it's popular so it sucks". Notice how a lot of them are turning against Helvetica since it's become too popular again, after being so eclipsed by Arial before.
I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
also, thoughts with regards to type design snatching:
I think stealing someone else's design and taking credit for it is hacky and tacky. Especially in this day and age, when typefaces are more readily identifiable with their creators...
Ironically the hatred of Arial appears to be partly because it's NOT a copy of Helvetica, except for overall proportions and spacing. The letterforms are not the same, and there are people out there who pick apart every single difference and claim that Helvetica is automatically better because of them.
Yeah, it's a modified Monotype Grotesque, which is fine because old hot-metal grotesques are awesome. Wikipedia says it was actually developed for an IBM branch in Tucson, AZ, back in the 1980s.
It smacks of more Mac vs. PC snobbery, since the Mac always had Real Helvetica (or at least, Adobe's licensed version in the LaserWriter, since you didn't get scalable fonts on the CPU unless you had ATM or waited for System 7).
Which pisses me off. I mean, it's pretty true that Apple sweats the intangibles a little more than Microsoft, always have, but they've produced their share of really stupid ideas too.
For what it's worth, back when I was in high school and had zero exposure to the typography fandom, I recognized that Arial and Helvetica were subtly but fundamentally different, and I greatly preferred Helvetica.
I was exclusively using Windows PCs, so I didn't even know Helvetica's name at the time. I just knew that I liked the one that didn't come pre-installed in MS Office.
(By the same token, my least favorite version of Garamond is also the one that comes with MS Office. Maybe I just have a "the grass is greener on the other side" problem.)
I first noticed Arial back in 1992, when a local for-sale paper apparently upgraded to Windows 3.1 and started using Arial for everything (previously, I think they'd been using whatever Helvetica-ish font was in their laser printer or DTP software). The Rs are very noticeable and very Grotesque (with a capital G).
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
All three of those new typefaces are pleasing ones, more's the point.
House's Yorklyn is interesting in that the 'Grand' means thinner lines than the 'Petite'. It's 'Grand' because it's designed for larger size lettering than the Petite.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Honestly, I think type itself is neutral territory, although it can have positive or negative associations for some and in some contexts. This really has nothing to do with what we do or do not consider a "conservative" or "progressive" font style, particularly given how futurism was tied reasonably closely with early fascism...
Comments
I was exclusively using Windows PCs, so I didn't even know Helvetica's name at the time. I just knew that I liked the one that didn't come pre-installed in MS Office.
(By the same token, my least favorite version of Garamond is also the one that comes with MS Office. Maybe I just have a "the grass is greener on the other side" problem.)
it's a typo graphy
大學的年同性戀毛皮
aaaaa