Talkin about Tumblrs, man

1167168170172173246

Comments

  • edited 2014-08-01 23:48:45
    THIS MACHINE KILLS FASCISTS
    Speaking of racists, I made the mistake of reading the comments on one of the White House's tweets about DACA. Tell you what, Twitter racists: if you want to secure the Mexican border, why don't you go magically create good jobs in Central America and help end the Mexican Drug War.

    Except that you can't, and you won't, because you want them all dead or in prison. Fuckers.
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    Why do people reply to posts in the tags? Instead of, you know, the actual post?
  • edited 2014-08-02 15:46:13

    Anonus said:

    Why do people reply to posts in the tags? Instead of, you know, the actual post?

    so it doesn't clutter up other people's dashboards/notifications

    it's generally understood to be the courteous thing to do
  • kill living beings
    i've seen at least one guy complain about that cos it means it's hard for him to see responses to his posts
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    naney said:

    Anonus said:

    Why do people reply to posts in the tags? Instead of, you know, the actual post?

    so it doesn't clutter up other people's dashboards/notifications

    it's generally understood to be the courteous thing to do
    yes

    but it's a pain in the ass to drag through all the tags

    I prefer to reply in the actual posts
  • Anonus said:

    naney said:

    Anonus said:

    Why do people reply to posts in the tags? Instead of, you know, the actual post?

    so it doesn't clutter up other people's dashboards/notifications

    it's generally understood to be the courteous thing to do
    yes

    but it's a pain in the ass to drag through all the tags

    I prefer to reply in the actual posts
    but then the other person sees it on their dashboard and maybe they don't want to read whatever you have to say on their post
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    they can just scroll by

    most of what I post isn't especially long anyway

    have to love how the "courteous" thing is actually less convenient
  • Sup bitches, witches, Haters, and trolls.
    tumblr: poorly designed since whenever tumblr started
  • Anonus said:

    naney said:

    Anonus said:

    Why do people reply to posts in the tags? Instead of, you know, the actual post?

    so it doesn't clutter up other people's dashboards/notifications

    it's generally understood to be the courteous thing to do
    yes

    but it's a pain in the ass to drag through all the tags

    I prefer to reply in the actual posts
    I suggest using xkit.

    I kind of get carried away with commenting using tags, I'm not sure why. It's just kind of fun, like doodling in the margins.
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    I prefer to actually add a comment if I have something to say, with rare exceptions. I use tags to organise, so unless there's a joke that I desperately want to make with tags (and it happens), I don't comment in them.

    Plus, sometimes I see people write comments in tags that outright bug me or I think are really clever and want to respond but can't because tags.
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    Tumblr is down
  • Anonus said:

    Tumblr is down


  • We can do anything if we do it together.
    image
  • Man is a most complex simple creature: see what he weaves, and how base his reasons for doing so.
    Anonus said:

    yes


    but it's a pain in the ass to drag through all the tags

    I prefer to reply in the actual posts
    There are things in Xkit that put all the tags into one column, specifically so that you don't have to do that.
  • My dreams exceed my real life
    http://stormingtheivory.tumblr.com/

    Tumblr person criticized 4chan, Tumblr rationalists suddenly join the battle on the 4chan side.
  • loud uncaring sounds
  • My dreams exceed my real life
    naney said:

    loud uncaring sounds

    familyguypetersayswhocares.wmv
  • Man, what if CIA Guy ended up being his own version of Batman.

    Like, the War Machine to Batman's Iron Man, or the Falcon to Batman's Captain America. Except, well, not black.
  • real talk tho this person seems moderately annoying
  • edited 2014-09-11 14:23:22
    We can do anything if we do it together.
    I was pretty floored by the "Beethoven is black" thing that this person seems to be pushing.

    I understand the frustration some people feel about the lack of historical figures that look like them, but that doesn't mean you can just make stuff up.
  • it's not just made up out of whole cloth, but it is based on rather tenuous information
  • kill living beings
    http://medievalpoc.tumblr.com/post/68770322910/

    it's pretty easy for me to believe that beethoven or whoever else had african ancestors and maybe even looked like it, and it's worthwhile to look at how that was suppressed by historians, but the "was black" thing kind of worries me. i mean race is socially constructed, and beethoven was living in a society that constructed it differently from the modern US or wherever. just kinda yeah
  • http://medievalpoc.tumblr.com/post/68770322910/

    it's pretty easy for me to believe that beethoven or whoever else had african ancestors and maybe even looked like it, and it's worthwhile to look at how that was suppressed by historians, but the "was black" thing kind of worries me. i mean race is socially constructed, and beethoven was living in a society that constructed it differently from the modern US or wherever. just kinda yeah

    p much
  • image

    simple, moving, powerful
  • edited 2014-09-11 15:17:46

    The Richie Rich collection retails at prices that only the poor little rich boy himself could afford: tanktops cost $62, hats $70, wallets $110, sweatshirts $158, and backpacks $200.
    in other news people on tumblr are entry-level as fuck smfh
  • I still don't understand how anyone could think anything over $20 is a reasonable price for any single item of clothing.
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    naney said:

    http://medievalpoc.tumblr.com/post/68770322910/

    it's pretty easy for me to believe that beethoven or whoever else had african ancestors and maybe even looked like it, and it's worthwhile to look at how that was suppressed by historians, but the "was black" thing kind of worries me. i mean race is socially constructed, and beethoven was living in a society that constructed it differently from the modern US or wherever. just kinda yeah

    p much
    Yeah, all of that. And looking at contemporary busts of the man... I wouldn't be surprised if he were at least partly of African descent. Not only are his features very classically mixed-race - there was an American fellow who looked a lot like him at the turn of the century whose name escapes me - but there have been black Africans in Central Europe since at least the beginning of the Holy Roman Empire.

    And really, for whom would it change what? He was Beethoven. He was very much a German regardless of racial background, and he was a mad genius and a bit of an asshat. It just changes the shade of how he is portrayed by half a degree and probably inspires a few more non-white folks to give classical music a shot. None of these are bad things!

    But in any case, calling him "black" imposes a dubious modern, American-centric paradigm on a society very different from our own and is probably not even entirely accurate within that paradigm. He was probably of mixed descent, and noticeably so, and people didn't care. You don't have to extrapolate beyond the facts to make a point.
  • well it's a thing you put on your body that other people see, you want it to fit well, be functional and last, those sorts of things require craftsmanship and superior materials and that costs money.

    not that an embroidered richie rich crewneck is by any means the pinnacle of design or craftsmanship or something i'd ever wear in a million years, but you get my point
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”

    I still don't understand how anyone could think anything over $20 is a reasonable price for any single item of clothing.

    If it is really well-made, by hand; constructed of durable, comfortable, beautiful materials; and fits you well and brings out your best features... why shouldn't you pay for that effort and quality? It's unfair to the maker.
  • kill living beings
    naney said:

    The Richie Rich collection retails at prices that only the poor little rich boy himself could afford: tanktops cost $62, hats $70, wallets $110, sweatshirts $158, and backpacks $200.
    in other news people on tumblr are entry-level as fuck smfh
    brb calling you out as classist on my blog

    get ready for anon hate mother fucker
  • naney said:

    well it's a thing you put on your body that other people see, you want it to fit well, be functional and last, those sorts of things require craftsmanship and superior materials and that costs money.

    does it though? Like I own $5 t-shirts that I've been wearing since high school and they still fit fine.

    Some are more intact than others, but you get my point.

    I still don't understand how anyone could think anything over $20 is a reasonable price for any single item of clothing.

    If it is really well-made, by hand; constructed of durable, comfortable, beautiful materials; and fits you well and brings out your best features... why shouldn't you pay for that effort and quality? It's unfair to the maker.
    largely I just buy clothes at department stores or thrift shops. I just kind of don't care about clothes that much and sort of resent the implication that that somehow makes me stupid.
  • kill living beings
    $5 is too much, you could just use a sturdy burlap sack

    anyway I'm considering buying a$40 hoodie from the school neuroscience club. it's totally overpriced and not that great a design but I'm pretty resolved to looking terrible, as evidenced by my shorts socks combo
  • $5 is too much, you could just use a sturdy burlap sack

    ironically, it might actually require more than $5 worth of time/effort to acquire a burlap sack in this day and age.



  • i've owned $5 t-shirts that have lasted since high-school too

    though i had to get rid of them because they ended up being way too large

    and i thrift all my clothes right now too because i don't have a job. but most of the stuff that i thrift was originally in the $60-400 range. except my t-shirts those i still buy in multi-packs at TJ Maxx because TJ Maxx t-shirt multi-packs are the best thing
  • but as soon as i get a job and cover all the shit i need to cover (seeing the beau, dad's b-day, ect.) i'm picking up some baller stuff
  • kill living beings

    $5 is too much, you could just use a sturdy burlap sack

    ironically, it might actually require more than $5 worth of time/effort to acquire a burlap sack in this day and age.



    I live in farmland.

    I guess if you're in an urban environment you could substitute something else. maybe drape yourself in discarded iPhones.
  • “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”

    If it is really well-made, by hand; constructed of durable, comfortable, beautiful materials; and fits you well and brings out your best features... why shouldn't you pay for that effort and quality? It's unfair to the maker.

    largely I just buy clothes at department stores or thrift shops. I just kind of don't care about clothes that much and sort of resent the implication that that somehow makes me stupid.
    Not being a big clothing person is fine, but acting like people should feel bad for appreciating more expensive clothing and acting as if the thought of more carefully made things costing more is silly is really kind of insulting.

    And no, Naney's comment was not aimed at you. It was aimed at the idea that $100 is expensive for clothing. For bad clothing, the price is exorbitant, but it is nowhere near the high end.
  • edited 2014-09-11 15:37:12
    “I'm surprised. Those clothes… but, aren't you…?”
    naney said:

    and i thrift all my clothes right now too because i don't have a job. but most of the stuff that i thrift was originally in the $60-400 range. except my t-shirts those i still buy in multi-packs at TJ Maxx because TJ Maxx t-shirt multi-packs are the best thing

    This.

    Getting good, ordinarily expensive-ish clothing cheap is a glorious thing. So are cheap clothes that fit and last.
  • If it is really well-made, by hand; constructed of durable, comfortable, beautiful materials; and fits you well and brings out your best features... why shouldn't you pay for that effort and quality? It's unfair to the maker.

    largely I just buy clothes at department stores or thrift shops. I just kind of don't care about clothes that much and sort of resent the implication that that somehow makes me stupid.
    Not being a big clothing person is fine, but acting like people should feel bad for appreciating more expensive clothing and acting as if the thought of more carefully made things costing more is silly is really kind of insulting.

    And no, Naney's comment was not aimed at you. It was aimed at the idea that $100 is expensive for clothing. For bad clothing, the price is exorbitant, but it is nowhere near the high end.
    Well OK, but you have to understand that my thoughts here come from somewhere. I've been witness to brand peacocking my entire life and I really do not understand it, and I've been insulted over that before. Even out here in the sticks where you'd think such things would be uncommon, it happens all the time. Though if I had to guess, what's considered fashionable up here is probably several leagues out of step with what is considered fashionable in more developed areas.
  • Sup bitches, witches, Haters, and trolls.
    the real question is, who wants richie rich branded clothing at all?
    • sasuke:what i'm after... is revolution
    • naruto:well have you planned out what to do after revolution
    • sasuke:what
    • sakura:yeah, after all, it'd be reckless to believe that just knocking down the existing structures would fix everything
    • sasuke:what
    • kakashi:that's right. the
      economic/political structures through the various villages right now are
      pretty hard-wired, and to change them for the better, certainly, the
      first step is doing away with the old, but if you don't have any steps
      afterwards, you're likely looking at the same old kind of powers rising
      up and taking control.
    • sasuke:what
    • naruto:so if we're going to
      go ahead with this revolution we also need to make sure that, beyond
      just killing the five kages, we tear down other capitalist structures
      underneath their reign and replace them with a system that uses
      resources and abilities - of which we seem to have almost no limit to,
      considering our own sizable skill with jutsus that allows us to move
      mountains themselves, our generate massive amounts of electrical power,
      for just a few examples - and put them to work making sure everyone is
      fed, sheltered, and has what they need.
    • sasuke:what
    • sakura:which isn't to say we
      can just stop there. there are other oppressive structures at work, not
      limited to just capital and how it is used and who it is put in the
      hands of, but multiple axes of power in general, as brought on by how
      history has been structured and the narratives given to us by both those
      in power and society as a whole, and working to remove those should
      also be part of our goal.
    • sasuke:what
    • kakashi:correct. now, if
      you'll look at this scroll here, i've started writing some theories on
      how, after revolution, we can use our jutsus, both as individuals and as
      a collective, to keep food production intact and distribute it to
      absolutely everyone
    • sasuke:i just
    • sasuke:i was just thinking i'd kill the five kages
    • naruto:well that seems very short sighted of you
  • Sup bitches, witches, Haters, and trolls.
    like I think even Anonus was mocking that brand
  • i know Мишка did a line of richie rich branded stuff before

    regardless, beats me
  • Мишка has also done stuff with Psychic TV, Crass and Spongebob Squarepants
  • Lilly said:

    the real question is, who wants richie rich branded clothing at all?

    this is actually a good point

    I guess the same kind of person that considers Donald Trump a good role model? idk
  • kill living beings
    sasuke confirmed for Marxist (TL note: burn!)
Sign In or Register to comment.