The Trash Heap of the Heapers' Hangout

1556455655567556955707762

Comments

  • golden teacher is the best 6 person post punk psychedelic vocal disco techno band in the entire world
  • Sup bitches, witches, Haters, and trolls.

    I am liking Fate/Zero.


    I think the most interesting dynamic is the conflict between machiavellian Masters and the various Servants the latter of whom due to being ancient heroes, god-kings, and the like, hold to ideals that are very different from those of the ones they serve, but are often no less self-serving.
    I have heard really good things about it, and while the first F/SN adaptation looks pretty naff I hear they're redoing with the Fate/Zero team.
    Yeah, there was an F/sn adaptation by DEEN that is very poorly animated and also of the most boring route(Fate, the first of the three routes); ufotable, who also did F/0 and Garden of Sinners, are currently doing a TV adaptation of the second of three routes(Unlimited Blade Works) and are going to do the third(Heaven's Feel) as either a movie or a series of movies; probably the latter considering the length of the material.
  • fight. dream. horse. love.
    I'm going to fail a test in an easy class tomorrow
  • i think i pronounce the band name "SUN ohhhh"
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    scary
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    you look like Harry Potter
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    glasses are pretty good but it's the hair that's totally stylin'
  • seems to be one of those looks that will last all of twenty minutes on me
  • Sup bitches, witches, Haters, and trolls.
    yes you have very swooshy hair
  • I'm surprised there's a Vocaloid skins mod for L4D2 but not a RWBY skins mod.
  • Sup bitches, witches, Haters, and trolls.
    vocaloids were on letterman
  • edited 2014-10-26 21:01:28
    no, just one

    [/most irrelevant rebuttal ever]
  • Sup bitches, witches, Haters, and trolls.
    the real question is: how long before a kagamine or whatever ends up on colbert
  • edited 2014-10-26 21:16:25
    Right now I'm watching as a raffle contest for a Steam game is happening in a Steam group that I'm a member of.

    The raffle is for a game that's base price US$4.99, current price -50% at US$2.49.  (And if really matters that much, it's sort of an obscure game, and it has trading cards, so the trading cards are pretty valuable.)  The game's name is Shan Gui; it's a visual novel by a Chinese devteam.

    There are a hundred slots for entry into the raffle drawing.  There is one prize.

    The payment to enter the raffle is one trading card.

    The usual price of even the least-desired and most-common trading cards...is roughly $0.06 to $0.10.  A hundred of them is $6 or $10.  Subtract Steam's commission for selling them on the Steam Community Market, and you get revenue of about $4 to $8.

    Or you can just keep the hundred new cards around to use as fodder for other trades.

    Capitalism, ho!
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    It irritates me that you can't even use the word "content" anymore without people getting upset

    What am I supposed to use, then? "Media"?
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    "stuff"
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    doesn't sound formal enough
  • i guess you'll have to be content with using a different word
  • edited 2014-10-26 21:59:29
    I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    I don't know

    Can't people let a little media-biz speak slide? I mean really not being able to stand the word "content" anymore? Seems excessive to me

    I can get wincing at referring to Spider-Man as a "brand" (or a "branded character") but come on
  • ULTRA-RAD HACKER REFUGEE FROM THE FUTURE
    the reason people have gotten sick of the word content is oversaturation.

    in almost any circumstance, being more specific about the kind of media you're referring to is possible, and the word is largely used in that context to deliberately devalue art as such.

    Calling it "content" and talking about "consuming" it is the verbal version of Apple's design aesthetic. It's so sleek and businessy that it puts a lot of people off by its very nature.
  • kill living beings
    your obedient serpent
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat

    the reason people have gotten sick of the word content is oversaturation.


    in almost any circumstance, being more specific about the kind of media you're referring to is possible, and the word is largely used in that context to deliberately devalue art as such.

    Calling it "content" and talking about "consuming" it is the verbal version of Apple's design aesthetic. It's so sleek and businessy that it puts a lot of people off by its very nature.
    Okay, I can get the devaluing of art being off-putting.

    But I don't dislike Apple's aesthetic - though of late Google and Microsoft have been doing simple better than they have.
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    Anonus is in the business of selling content to the masses

    bits of information to be translated into dollars
  • naney said:

    i guess you'll have to be content with using a different word

    APPRECIATE MY PUN
  • ULTRA-RAD HACKER REFUGEE FROM THE FUTURE
    El Kabong said:

    the reason people have gotten sick of the word content is oversaturation.


    in almost any circumstance, being more specific about the kind of media you're referring to is possible, and the word is largely used in that context to deliberately devalue art as such.

    Calling it "content" and talking about "consuming" it is the verbal version of Apple's design aesthetic. It's so sleek and businessy that it puts a lot of people off by its very nature.
    Okay, I can get the devaluing of art being off-putting.

    But I don't dislike Apple's aesthetic - though of late Google and Microsoft have been doing simple better than they have.
    I suspect that not minding Apple's aesthetic and not minding the word "content" may go hand in hand, though I have nothing to back this up.
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    naney said:

    naney said:

    i guess you'll have to be content with using a different word

    APPRECIATE MY PUN
    good job Haven
  • El Kabong said:

    the reason people have gotten sick of the word content is oversaturation.


    in almost any circumstance, being more specific about the kind of media you're referring to is possible, and the word is largely used in that context to deliberately devalue art as such.

    Calling it "content" and talking about "consuming" it is the verbal version of Apple's design aesthetic. It's so sleek and businessy that it puts a lot of people off by its very nature.
    Okay, I can get the devaluing of art being off-putting.

    But I don't dislike Apple's aesthetic - though of late Google and Microsoft have been doing simple better than they have.
    I suspect that not minding Apple's aesthetic and not minding the word "content" may go hand in hand, though I have nothing to back this up.
    There's always most of my existence! That's a good thing to cite, I'd think.
  • Sup bitches, witches, Haters, and trolls.

    naney said:

    naney said:

    i guess you'll have to be content with using a different word

    APPRECIATE MY PUN
    good job Haven
    i sometimes curse haven for puns he had no hand in
  • ULTRA-RAD HACKER REFUGEE FROM THE FUTURE
    >implying Haven isn't a trickster spirit that can possess people for pun
  • the reason people have gotten sick of the word content is oversaturation.


    in almost any circumstance, being more specific about the kind of media you're referring to is possible, and the word is largely used in that context to deliberately devalue art as such.

    Calling it "content" and talking about "consuming" it is the verbal version of Apple's design aesthetic. It's so sleek and businessy that it puts a lot of people off by its very nature.


    is this yet another internet drama/argument/thing that i missed and now i can't use the term "content" anymore as a generic placeholder for talking about creative works?

    ...well i guess i still have "works"
  • I saw the gods in the eyes of my father on the last day he waved good-bye.
    I saw the gods starring at the night sky with a friend standing on lake ice.
    I saw god in the eyes of my nephew just minutes after his birth.
    I saw the gods at the end of symbol when an emptied horn made flames burst!
    I see the gods!
  • Man is a most complex simple creature: see what he weaves, and how base his reasons for doing so.
    Just say "stuff" instead of "content."
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    I already suggested that!
  • social constructs may be arbitrary but they are real because their realness is based solely in people's acting upon belief in them, not in their grounding in logic or hard facts
  • i was lead to this statement thinking about race but it applies to a whole fuckton of things
  • and by arbitrary i mean that this arbitrariness is on the part of the overall society, not individual members
  • THIS MACHINE KILLS FASCISTS
    so anyway THE VAN IS LEGAL IT'S ABOUT TIME

    Now I just need to get the Prius inspected before the 31st...
  • I'm tripping the hell out over how perfect the minor circuit theme from Punch Out!! is
  • Man is a most complex simple creature: see what he weaves, and how base his reasons for doing so.
    That's pretty neat.

    Is it unfair that if I see anyone use Family Guy in-jokes, I immediately judge them as foolish unfunny fools who aren't fooling anyone?
  • I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    that's because you'll never understand the genius of giant chicken fights that go on for five minutes at a time
  • This is something that'll make you all immediately distrust me, but honestly? Family Guy has been very, very funny at times. The issue is that the series has no idea how to integrate humor into its plot, and it sacrifices too many things in favor of adding layers of irony and affectation to its jokes.

    Hell, the joke behind the cutaway gag is pretty funny in a meta way (and relied on a delicate balance of the absurdity of cutting away from the plot along with the bizarre situations presented, and the sheer volume of the gag), but it should have stopped after the show tried going self aware, for example.

    But Todd in the Shadows put it well when he said the show would throw away anything for the sake of a joke, and a lot of the times it just simply doesn't work.

    I don't think it's a bad or good show, just horribly uneven. It gets crap because its issues are numerous and obvious.
  • ULTRA-RAD HACKER REFUGEE FROM THE FUTURE
    Family Guy (when I watched it, though it's been a long time) was fine when it didn't try to do satire, which is why it's weird to me that everyone criticizes the cutaway gags as being what's wrong with the show.
  • Well I don't like the cutaway gags because they're not my taste.

    Though now that I think about it, I'm not sure what's left of FG after you discard the cutaway gags.
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
    Time for another Monday morning lecture

    And not a moment too soon
Sign In or Register to comment.