You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Your piece is empty rhetoric. You start with risible pathos of the Bourgeois Seeker. You commence telling the story of middle management technicians made sad by the disruption of their production process by "eco-anarchists".Without naming these culprits guilty of provoking the bourgeois tears, you inform us they have no real objection to capital and its expropration and exploitation which they disrupt but, rather, are motivated by an irrational hatred of 'technology and progress itself.' You fail to note that regardless of their feelings in this vein, which it is far from clear you really know, their actions disrupt the accumulation of capital.
You refer to 'technology and progress itself' and then, on twitter, attribute this absurdity to Marx, who repeatedly, painstakingly clearly and explicity rejected such concoctions of idealism. Indeed "Marxism" is most often colloquially a name for seeing through such ideological mythologiies.
You stage a reified "technology" interchangeable with "industry" and favour the second standard usage of the term -- technology in the sense of machines not the processes of their production and deployment - (which is post-Marx) but reason as if it were the only sense of the word (you suppress the primary sense).
In passing you stage a little vignette, a bit of reactiionary white supremacist agit prop; I refer to this interlude of "Rwandan genocide" conducted with "knives". The purpose of this imagery - to make vivid affectively and irrationally the silly Hegelian Whiggishness about idealized abstract 'Progress as such' you are proposing as the victim of reactionary primitivists - is not as carefully veiled as you seem to suppose.
You misuse the term 'political economy' in a nonsense sentence that has the superficial appearance of meaning.
You play a crude and obvious shell game attributing - by innuendo, complete with enough ambiguity in your prose construction to allow an escape route from challenge - the disingenuous tactics of right wing climate change denialists to "Anti-GM" activists, under cover of diagnosing some kind of negationist "single study" syndrome.
While everyone knows the militant resistance to GM crops is principally due to their proprietary locked character and the enormous enclosure, dispossession and wealth transfer from the global peasantry to the capitaliist imperial ruling class this entails - mature plants don't produce seeds for new sowing, and so their proliferation will eradicate humanity's food soources completely leaving the imperialist capitalist elite in literally control of all the resources necessary human survival - and not to their health risks, you focus on the latter which you pretend to rebut by smear and irrelevancies, avoiding any discussion of actual biology and biochemistry. You should but of course don't stress the burden of proof that there are no health risks to consumers in these foods should be on the manufacturers nut deliberately substitute this issue for the class resistance to the ruling class war praxis that is genetic modification of food crops. You invent out of whole cloth the fiction that the resistance to these sterlile crops, which are the enclosure of vast natural resources by capital, is totally reliant on a single study about possible health effects on people who eat this stuff, that you, and not the objects of your attacks, give prominence in your discussion. You stage your ability to discredit this one study as a triumphant proof of the benefits of GM foods when the study is of no importance. It is you who are guilty of this "single study" tactic, suggesting that by debunking a single study of no significance you have exposed the fallacy underlying the motives of a political struggle that in fact have nothing to do with that study.
These fatuous doings are then followed by further staging of emotionally distressed middle managers who are 'scared to death' of their idiot friends or your cartoon anarchists and sad that people are thwarting their capitalist paymasters. It's like the news reports on a UPS strike that focused on women whose weddings were ruined - the most important day in a girl's life! - because the UPS wedding dress didnt arrive.
This kind of propagandistic punditry really can only fool bobo bozos predisposed to the boourgeois fears i provokes and desirous of the comforts it offers.
I've gone back as far as I can possibly go, I am officially locked out of all of my old email accounts. All motherfucking five of them going back to 2007.
The oldest one doesn't have a backup e-mail associated with it and its only method of recovery is one of those "send a text message to (x) number" things, and I know for a fact we don't have that phone anymore.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
The Dodge Charger is my favorite of the currently-produced American police cars, I think
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Things I shouldn't do while loopy: edit my Tumblr theme
Because I'm totally tempted to replace "Powered by Tumblr" at the bottom of the sidebar with "Powered by Alicorn Magic"
i also dont find that much good from last.fm these days, spotify recommendations tends to give me better stuff. funnily enough because it tends to be a bit wonkier, gives me more tangentially related stuff... as opposed to just 'people on the same label and side projects' which last.fm similar artists seems to be stuffed with somtimes
Comments
Now Enrolling
You refer to 'technology and progress itself' and then, on twitter, attribute this absurdity to Marx, who repeatedly, painstakingly clearly and explicity rejected such concoctions of idealism. Indeed "Marxism" is most often colloquially a name for seeing through such ideological mythologiies.
You stage a reified "technology" interchangeable with "industry" and favour the second standard usage of the term -- technology in the sense of machines not the processes of their production and deployment - (which is post-Marx) but reason as if it were the only sense of the word (you suppress the primary sense).
In passing you stage a little vignette, a bit of reactiionary white supremacist agit prop; I refer to this interlude of "Rwandan genocide" conducted with "knives". The purpose of this imagery - to make vivid affectively and irrationally the silly Hegelian Whiggishness about idealized abstract 'Progress as such' you are proposing as the victim of reactionary primitivists - is not as carefully veiled as you seem to suppose.
You misuse the term 'political economy' in a nonsense sentence that has the superficial appearance of meaning.
You play a crude and obvious shell game attributing - by innuendo, complete with enough ambiguity in your prose construction to allow an escape route from challenge - the disingenuous tactics of right wing climate change denialists to "Anti-GM" activists, under cover of diagnosing some kind of negationist "single study" syndrome.
While everyone knows the militant resistance to GM crops is principally due to their proprietary locked character and the enormous enclosure, dispossession and wealth transfer from the global peasantry to the capitaliist imperial ruling class this entails - mature plants don't produce seeds for new sowing, and so their proliferation will eradicate humanity's food soources completely leaving the imperialist capitalist elite in literally control of all the resources necessary human survival - and not to their health risks, you focus on the latter which you pretend to rebut by smear and irrelevancies, avoiding any discussion of actual biology and biochemistry. You should but of course don't stress the burden of proof that there are no health risks to consumers in these foods should be on the manufacturers nut deliberately substitute this issue for the class resistance to the ruling class war praxis that is genetic modification of food crops. You invent out of whole cloth the fiction that the resistance to these sterlile crops, which are the enclosure of vast natural resources by capital, is totally reliant on a single study about possible health effects on people who eat this stuff, that you, and not the objects of your attacks, give prominence in your discussion. You stage your ability to discredit this one study as a triumphant proof of the benefits of GM foods when the study is of no importance. It is you who are guilty of this "single study" tactic, suggesting that by debunking a single study of no significance you have exposed the fallacy underlying the motives of a political struggle that in fact have nothing to do with that study.
These fatuous doings are then followed by further staging of emotionally distressed middle managers who are 'scared to death' of their idiot friends or your cartoon anarchists and sad that people are thwarting their capitalist paymasters. It's like the news reports on a UPS strike that focused on women whose weddings were ruined - the most important day in a girl's life! - because the UPS wedding dress didnt arrive.
This kind of propagandistic punditry really can only fool bobo bozos predisposed to the boourgeois fears i provokes and desirous of the comforts it offers.
Time, time, I NEED MORE TIME!!
RESU
*my Path of Exile password
*my Yahoo! password
*the password to the backup account for my Yahoo! account
fuck, basically.
pro tip, I am *never* going to want to access your shitty Facebook ripoff.
Please stop trying to send me there.
I fucking hate everybody.
I've gone back as far as I can possibly go, I am officially locked out of all of my old email accounts. All motherfucking five of them going back to 2007.
The oldest one doesn't have a backup e-mail associated with it and its only method of recovery is one of those "send a text message to (x) number" things, and I know for a fact we don't have that phone anymore.
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudes
But it's OK cuz I can make cool if somewhat uncomplex things with this thing.
....
I am very done with today.
pretty ebin I like it :DDD
My face looks like that right now, I cringed so hard