You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Whoever drew the Archie comic strip in the '90s must have lived in Southern California or something, since they apparently didn't know what a snow shovel looks like:
I think that it's brave to say your opinion and try to defend it (when almost everyone disagrees with you).
That does not necessarily make it a good/acceptable thing, though (sometimes there is a reason why almost everyone disagrees with a certain opinion).
For example, it would be brave to go into a quiet library and start playing a vuvuzela; in that you'd be going against everyone around (but it would be rude, inconsiderate, and not acceptable; and people would be right to get ticked at you for doing it) so it's brave in a very jerkfacey way.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
That's "Nexus-five" as in a Nexus-related high five
I don't really get the point of this gallery. I mean, the drawings are nice, but most of the costumes are very similar to those of the movies', only more detailed
I am not going to argue about loli art today, but I don't see anything wrong with using the word "loli," considering its long-established usage in anime lexicon. Lolis are things.
what exactly is wrong with saying little/young girls, like a normal person?
and you know perfectly well how it came to be in said lexicon, insofar as such a thing exists (the anime fandom not being a monolith). there are plenty of established English words that you wouldn't use. i don't see you throwing ethnic slurs around, or homophobic language.
i can't make you stop using the word, but i'm letting you know that it bothers me, and that i'd rather you didn't
I don't even like that stuff and I'm still enraged it was taken off TV Tropes.
It had informative value. For example, I could read the pages and then get enough information on it to carry on an informed conversation about those shows without having to look up screenshots or video uploads. And that's a damn good thing.
setting aside the question of why you'd want to discuss something so unpleasant, there's always Wikipedia
TV Tropes is useful at times, but it's usually more of a fan site than a practical resource
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Holy shit, I've been complaining about the basement being too cold for weeks now
And it turns out one of the windows was open slightly
That probably should have been the first thing I checked, but...who the fuck would expect the window to be open in January?
I wish we could personally give approval scores for things. Not just upvote/downvote.
So instead of just saying "I approve of / am satisfied with TV Tropes", I could say "I have a 56-44 approval opinion of TV Tropes", indicating that I am not all that satisfied with it, but I am satisfied enough that I still have a slightly positive opinion of it.
One could extend this method to, say, politicians and other officials.
Now that 100-point scale might be too much to practically wrap one's head around.
Maybe a ten-point scale?
So I have, say, a 6-to-4 approval rating of TV Tropes.
I have a 7-to-3 approval rating of Barack Obama's performance as POTUS.
This principle can be extended to favorability scores (which are reported similarly in the media, like approval ratings) (which are basically the same thing).
I have a 5-5 approval rating (i.e. "so-so") of Google's services that I use, while I have a 4-6 favorability rating (i.e. "slightly unfavorable") of the company as a whole.
Oh, also, one could incorporate familiarity into approval/favorability ratings.
For example, I could say I have a 1-4-5 favorability rating of SomethingAwful: 1 count of favorableness, 4 counts of unfavorableness, and 5 counts of I just don't know much about it.
So I could say that my opinion of Macklemore is 0-0-10, because I have no idea who that is.
but everyone talks about how terrible he is for God knows whatever reason, be it that his sound changed, his new sound sucks or his old sound sucked
I mean, I can understand why his stuff would be divisive but somehow I'm not seeing the reason why trying out new genres within EDM (ugh) is an inherently bad thing.
but everyone talks about how terrible he is for God knows whatever reason, be it that his sound changed, his new sound sucks or his old sound sucked
I mean, I can understand why his stuff would be divisive but somehow I'm not seeing the reason why trying out new genres within EDM (ugh) is an inherently bad thing.
i don't see why he's so terrible
i think he's overhyped but i don't think he's terrible
Comments
That does not necessarily make it a good/acceptable thing, though (sometimes there is a reason why almost everyone disagrees with a certain opinion).
For example, it would be brave to go into a quiet library and start playing a vuvuzela; in that you'd be going against everyone around (but it would be rude, inconsiderate, and not acceptable; and people would be right to get ticked at you for doing it) so it's brave in a very jerkfacey way.
This is the greatest webcomic, it's just perfect on every way.
t. comics expert
where's the Burger King breakfast I was promised.
(since every use of the word "fate" requires a Fate Testarossa pun)
but do not fear, I shall return
Later all.
and the last one made me grin :)
what exactly is wrong with saying little/young girls, like a normal person?
and you know perfectly well how it came to be in said lexicon, insofar as such a thing exists (the anime fandom not being a monolith). there are plenty of established English words that you wouldn't use. i don't see you throwing ethnic slurs around, or homophobic language.
i can't make you stop using the word, but i'm letting you know that it bothers me, and that i'd rather you didn't setting aside the question of why you'd want to discuss something so unpleasant, there's always Wikipedia
TV Tropes is useful at times, but it's usually more of a fan site than a practical resource
i don't understand why you do this, but it's fairly irritating. You know what TVT is. You used to be a troper, like most of us.
just because you don't like it doesn't mean you have to feign ignorance every time it comes up in conversation.
posting on this site does not make us automatically better than them, especially not if we're going to act like them
I am so very confused.
https://twitter.com/macklemore/status/1849518760
it's simply not impressive or inspiring
So instead of just saying "I approve of / am satisfied with TV Tropes", I could say "I have a 56-44 approval opinion of TV Tropes", indicating that I am not all that satisfied with it, but I am satisfied enough that I still have a slightly positive opinion of it.
One could extend this method to, say, politicians and other officials.
Now that 100-point scale might be too much to practically wrap one's head around.
Maybe a ten-point scale?
So I have, say, a 6-to-4 approval rating of TV Tropes.
I have a 7-to-3 approval rating of Barack Obama's performance as POTUS.
This principle can be extended to favorability scores (which are reported similarly in the media, like approval ratings) (which are basically the same thing).
I have a 5-5 approval rating (i.e. "so-so") of Google's services that I use, while I have a 4-6 favorability rating (i.e. "slightly unfavorable") of the company as a whole.
For example, I could say I have a 1-4-5 favorability rating of SomethingAwful: 1 count of favorableness, 4 counts of unfavorableness, and 5 counts of I just don't know much about it.
So I could say that my opinion of Macklemore is 0-0-10, because I have no idea who that is.
No, it's not, and I'd appreciate the answer even if it was.
Thanks.
I mean, I can understand why his stuff would be divisive but somehow I'm not seeing the reason why trying out new genres within EDM (ugh) is an inherently bad thing.
i think he's overhyped but i don't think he's terrible
The weird thing is having to feel awkward for liking someone everyone else seems to dislike with a passion.