More people have said that and been killed than there are thorium decay products.
Eight whole hours! There was this dark hour, you see, and the moon was really big, and everyone was a coffin, and my high school morphed into a giant tower of toothpaste... it was nuts!
More people have said that and been killed than there are thorium decay products.
when the bobby's in the thread, drop it like it's hot drop it like it's hot, drop it like it's hot when the bobby's in the thread, drop it like it's hot drop it like it's hot, drop it like it's hot
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
So, on one hand my attempt at staying awake all the way till 6 AM to fix my sleep schedule failed.
On the other hand, I made it pretty darn close and can probably just call it "close enough" and get in bed now with no ill side effects.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Basically, it sounds like the drive's about to drop dead, and in a way that doesn't seem to be causing any bad sectors, too. And on a drive with only 1000 power-on hours, too. :P
Twenty three billion angry tortoises downed a litre of rubbing alcohol per head and swam across the channel to beat the English, and soon London was theirs! Then they had a fiesta, and when they were tired out after that, a siesta, and then they listened to S Club 7, heavily distorted and with ridiculously bass-heavy speakers, mistaking it for a proper tune
Harman should be totally ashamed of nominating himself as a ‘Heideggerian’. Heidegger and Harman are radical petty-bourgeois nazi philosophers who reduce beings to objects objectifying being as a forgetting of being displacing beings with objects ordaining an object orientated ontology which is an oxymoron for objects are not beings. Object-Oriented Ontology is a Proto-Nazi Philosophy and fascist to the core. Harman also absurdly says how ‘sensitive’ Heidegger was and how upsetting it was that we do not know about Heidegger’s sister! Harman has a permanent hard-on for Heidegger! Harman is a Nazi philospher whilst Badiou is an anti-Semite whilst Zizek is a fascist-Stalisnist: yet these non-original and over-rated non-thinkers are treated like star-celebrities which is very dangerous and worrying becuase they overtly condone racism, nazism and anti-semitism as being ‘cool’ and ‘fashionsable’ and ‘acceptable’
Yes: I am an idiot and I am stupid: It essential for an original thinker to be an idiot and to be stupid and being ignorant and idiotic: this originates the thicking in the thinking: My MA is meaningless: just administartive lavatory paper not worth wiping my arse with. Please try and be an idiot and stupid and read Avital Ronell’s ‘Stupidity’ – you may learn to think more stupidly and more idiotically – if you dare!
Object-oriented ontology is an obnoxious oxymoron for there are no ontological-objects for there are no objects anyway so we must object to object-oriented ontology which is an objectification and reification of being and beings in the world and out the world for there are no objects both in the world and out the world just as there are no things in the world and out the world yet is human-lack in the lack in understanding in the lack of understanding the world as a whole that makes man objectify being making being into a thinging in to an object forgetting that an amethyst has being as air has being as water has being as a human has being but the radical difference of beings makes men divide beings into a taxonomic classification of catalogued objects Object-oriented ontologists are akin to school boys who like stamp-collecting or train-spotting acting as boy-scout colonialist-imperialist pioneers pillaging the world of beings and turning them into objects to be collected and collated and catalogued through the anally retentive administration of taxonomy in order to control and name and masturbate all over their memorabilia and ephemerality of named objects forgetting that there are no finite-objects only beings of infinite becoming that cannot be ‘objectified’ that cannot be ‘objects’ because to be is necessarily not ‘object’ for what they nominate as an ‘object’ is the naming that is the forgetting of being for to name is to forget being for the name kills the being so we must now kill the name ‘object’
In reality there are no objects for out reality there are no objects for reality knows nothing of obpothetical objects for reality needs nothings of hypothetical objects for what is object is an optical oblusion ablusion illusion of reality that objectifies that reality there that reality in there that reality out there that is alien to objectification to objectation so we must object to using the obsurd obstration object and in our body we know no object as out our body we know no object and we desire no object and no object desires us just as we now know that there is no subject and no subject of desire or desire of a subject so we must stop being so subjected to subjectivity and subjecthood as well as objectivity and objecthood for there are no objects no subjects
In the vicinity of the artwork we are aware that there are no artobjects for the work of art is not an object of art for art announces that there are no objects in the world and no subjects in the world for the artwork awakens an answer within without us to being in the world where there is no time and no space just being art being by art being by art working for in the vacant-vicinity of the artwork we are close to the near by in being next to nothing being an arting awaring that there are no objects and no subjects in our world in our being in our art for our world is not an object for our being is not an object for our art is not an object thus art is the concealment of the there not there revealing to our being there not there that there are no objects in the world
An artwork as utterly unique and original ordains itself afresh free from objectification ordaining itself as being objectless initiating itself into the world as a being and not as a hypothetical object by just being a being as it stands before you stripping you of your synthetic subjectivity for art is the real in realising that there are no objects in the world and no subjects in the world for art announces a world without objects and a world without subjects so making an obtuse object oriented ontology as an absolute impossibility of objects ever even existing for this that there then them those these implies absolute separation severing into a taxonomic classification of beings and non-beings that are all actually all in one being one in all the same being one
It is essential to artworks that they be beings by being in their own right as autonomous beings unmade by human beings but mediated and filtered through human beings whom are the tool-beings tooling-arting being-near-by-there but not actually made-there by the tool-being alone for tool-being is merely an antenna-aerial that art-forms filtering-forming arting thereing but non-humans are not doing art because non-humans have no lack that is have no need to do art even if one were to idly and inanely speculate that a fly may land on a wet canvas and have a walk around making-marks but those marks are merely accidents that may or may not make the artwork more interesting or more boring but the fly is disinterested in making a work of art
Initially every artwork is initiated and instigated as Identical with itself and knows nothing of outer externalised iedntities and knows nothing of objects and knows nothing of subjects for the artwork is being-in-itself that has its own infinite origin its own finite origin being the finite of the infinite and the infinite of the finite for what makes art eternal is its finity within infinity and its infinity within finity being both in time and out of time all the time which is why the human-being secretly hold a grudge and a malice towards the artwork knowing that the artwork will survive them for the artwork is aware of existing as a life before birth of existing as a life after death whilst the human-being knows-nothing of existing before birth or of existing after death
In being in the world I am aware that a chair is not a chair when there is no one sitting there but a chair becomes a chair when a being is sitting there in the world there a chair becoming a being there and a chair becomes what they wrongly nominate as an object if someone is sitting there or not sitting there but the chair is not an object but a being after a human being is sitting in the chair igniting the being in the chair being there where being is the chairing a human being chairing and the chair being becomes one with the human being when the human being becomes caring for the chairing when sitting in the chair bringing being to the chair being there chairing there the human there the chair there where the chair there is chairing being human being
Objectless ontology observes that there are no object oriented ontologies for there are no non-human objects only non-human alien abjects and animal abjects that exist exogenously as abjected alien ontologies as abjected animal ontologies and object oriented ontologies still elevate the human-being above the alien-being and the animal-being and the world-being by being a superior and special species above aliens and animals by being a humanist philosophy despite its non-human turn as a non-human humanism reducing the human-being to other non-beings so object oriented ontology ontologises so-called objects with an equal opportunities ontology where so-called objects are catalogued as all equal and that everything exists equally
If objects really existed in real life in the real world then they would take on ontologies that would be utterly unique and amazing and astonishing by their awesome altarity and diffuse difference and begin to question our own obtuse ontologies which lack the understanding and the knowing of other beings and nonbeings yet object oriented ontology fetishises beings and nonbeings as anesthetized and neutralised objects to be catalogued in the clinical calculating disinterestedness of object-fetishism and object-fetishism is object-fascism for object oriented ontology is fascism to its inner most core as a fascist object fetish oriented ontology with its reactionary and regressive fascistic fetishism of objectifying everything as a neutralizing and levelling
Being an alien I am unaware that there are things or objects as aliens do not know of distinctions of differences of demarcations of separations since there is nothing after one so there can be no-objects and not even one object because one is not an object because one is not a unit for one is the being-alling where there are no numbers and so for the alien-beings there are no-objects and no-things but for the human-beings lacking higher alien intelligence they still have this fascistic fetishisation with severing and splitting and cataloguing and curating wounding-the-worlding as if the world was an operating theatre where what was one was violently operated upon and all the internal organs were wrenched out dissected and named then blood drained
Comments
i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
uh-huh you know what it is
everything she does, she does with fish
But he left it in a cab
i stared into the void tonight
The best dream i ever had
drop it like it's hot, drop it like it's hot
when the bobby's in the thread, drop it like it's hot
drop it like it's hot, drop it like it's hot
Who said that? Jean Paul-Sartre, wasn't it?
2. put kettle on
3. listen to music/read/watch stupid videos on youtube/shitpost
4. return to find kettle has been emptied
5. repeat
What does it mean?
Object-oriented ontology is an obnoxious oxymoron for there are no ontological-objects for there are no objects anyway so we must object to object-oriented ontology which is an objectification and reification of being and beings in the world and out the world for there are no objects both in the world and out the world just as there are no things in the world and out the world yet is human-lack in the lack in understanding in the lack of understanding the world as a whole that makes man objectify being making being into a thinging in to an object forgetting that an amethyst has being as air has being as water has being as a human has being but the radical difference of beings makes men divide beings into a taxonomic classification of catalogued objects
Object-oriented ontologists are akin to school boys who like stamp-collecting or train-spotting acting as boy-scout colonialist-imperialist pioneers pillaging the world of beings and turning them into objects to be collected and collated and catalogued through the anally retentive administration of taxonomy in order to control and name and masturbate all over their memorabilia and ephemerality of named objects forgetting that there are no finite-objects only beings of infinite becoming that cannot be ‘objectified’ that cannot be ‘objects’ because to be is necessarily not ‘object’ for what they nominate as an ‘object’ is the naming that is the forgetting of being for to name is to forget being for the name kills the being so we must now kill the name ‘object’
In reality there are no objects for out reality there are no objects for reality knows nothing of obpothetical objects for reality needs nothings of hypothetical objects for what is object is an optical oblusion ablusion illusion of reality that objectifies that reality there that reality in there that reality out there that is alien to objectification to objectation so we must object to using the obsurd obstration object and in our body we know no object as out our body we know no object and we desire no object and no object desires us just as we now know that there is no subject and no subject of desire or desire of a subject so we must stop being so subjected to subjectivity and subjecthood as well as objectivity and objecthood for there are no objects no subjects
In the vicinity of the artwork we are aware that there are no artobjects for the work of art is not an object of art for art announces that there are no objects in the world and no subjects in the world for the artwork awakens an answer within without us to being in the world where there is no time and no space just being art being by art being by art working for in the vacant-vicinity of the artwork we are close to the near by in being next to nothing being an arting awaring that there are no objects and no subjects in our world in our being in our art for our world is not an object for our being is not an object for our art is not an object thus art is the concealment of the there not there revealing to our being there not there that there are no objects in the world
An artwork as utterly unique and original ordains itself afresh free from objectification ordaining itself as being objectless initiating itself into the world as a being and not as a hypothetical object by just being a being as it stands before you stripping you of your synthetic subjectivity for art is the real in realising that there are no objects in the world and no subjects in the world for art announces a world without objects and a world without subjects so making an obtuse object oriented ontology as an absolute impossibility of objects ever even existing for this that there then them those these implies absolute separation severing into a taxonomic classification of beings and non-beings that are all actually all in one being one in all the same being one
It is essential to artworks that they be beings by being in their own right as autonomous beings unmade by human beings but mediated and filtered through human beings whom are the tool-beings tooling-arting being-near-by-there but not actually made-there by the tool-being alone for tool-being is merely an antenna-aerial that art-forms filtering-forming arting thereing but non-humans are not doing art because non-humans have no lack that is have no need to do art even if one were to idly and inanely speculate that a fly may land on a wet canvas and have a walk around making-marks but those marks are merely accidents that may or may not make the artwork more interesting or more boring but the fly is disinterested in making a work of art
Initially every artwork is initiated and instigated as Identical with itself and knows nothing of outer externalised iedntities and knows nothing of objects and knows nothing of subjects for the artwork is being-in-itself that has its own infinite origin its own finite origin being the finite of the infinite and the infinite of the finite for what makes art eternal is its finity within infinity and its infinity within finity being both in time and out of time all the time which is why the human-being secretly hold a grudge and a malice towards the artwork knowing that the artwork will survive them for the artwork is aware of existing as a life before birth of existing as a life after death whilst the human-being knows-nothing of existing before birth or of existing after death
In being in the world I am aware that a chair is not a chair when there is no one sitting there but a chair becomes a chair when a being is sitting there in the world there a chair becoming a being there and a chair becomes what they wrongly nominate as an object if someone is sitting there or not sitting there but the chair is not an object but a being after a human being is sitting in the chair igniting the being in the chair being there where being is the chairing a human being chairing and the chair being becomes one with the human being when the human being becomes caring for the chairing when sitting in the chair bringing being to the chair being there chairing there the human there the chair there where the chair there is chairing being human being
Objectless ontology observes that there are no object oriented ontologies for there are no non-human objects only non-human alien abjects and animal abjects that exist exogenously as abjected alien ontologies as abjected animal ontologies and object oriented ontologies still elevate the human-being above the alien-being and the animal-being and the world-being by being a superior and special species above aliens and animals by being a humanist philosophy despite its non-human turn as a non-human humanism reducing the human-being to other non-beings so object oriented ontology ontologises so-called objects with an equal opportunities ontology where so-called objects are catalogued as all equal and that everything exists equally
If objects really existed in real life in the real world then they would take on ontologies that would be utterly unique and amazing and astonishing by their awesome altarity and diffuse difference and begin to question our own obtuse ontologies which lack the understanding and the knowing of other beings and nonbeings yet object oriented ontology fetishises beings and nonbeings as anesthetized and neutralised objects to be catalogued in the clinical calculating disinterestedness of object-fetishism and object-fetishism is object-fascism for object oriented ontology is fascism to its inner most core as a fascist object fetish oriented ontology with its reactionary and regressive fascistic fetishism of objectifying everything as a neutralizing and levelling
Being an alien I am unaware that there are things or objects as aliens do not know of distinctions of differences of demarcations of separations since there is nothing after one so there can be no-objects and not even one object because one is not an object because one is not a unit for one is the being-alling where there are no numbers and so for the alien-beings there are no-objects and no-things but for the human-beings lacking higher alien intelligence they still have this fascistic fetishisation with
severing and splitting and cataloguing and curating wounding-the-worlding as if the world was an operating theatre where what was one was violently operated upon and all the internal organs were wrenched out dissected and named then blood drained
Again.
:p