The Trash Heap of the Heapers' Hangout

1195519561958196019617762

Comments

  • not like it's a bad show, it just has somewhat confusing conclusions.
  • imagei will watch the heck outta this pumpkin patch

    I'm not sure how to answer this, since the original post wasn't very well thought-out, but basically I worry I'd be seen as trying to "freeload", so to speak. (Even though I would of course get a job and pay taxes.)


    I think it's unlikely that you'd be perceived that way, honestly.  It might depend where in the UK you were, but generally I'd imagine not.

    Re: Eva, I get the impression it's one of those shows you're expected to have seen, but what little I have hasn't left me with a strong compulsion to do so, and I'm not that into anime.  Maybe some day, if I have a lot of time to spare, I guess.
  • Doctor Who reference in Pokemon B2W2? Headcanon accepted.

    also, I've never seen Eva


    given the average reaction of everyone who has seen it, this was a wise idea on my part
    I really think you should at least give the whole series a try. It's at least worth one watch through.
    Nope

    it's left too many heartbroken and angry otaku in its wake

    I'll pass
  • I dunno, this place has become such a snarkville I'm a bit uncomfortable with it.


  • Naney said:

    I dunno, this place has become such a snarkville I'm a bit uncomfortable with it.



  • edited 2012-12-17 12:58:51
    as long as they don't have vocals, i can listen to songs

    cool headache bro

    what is a snarkville
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
    Another reason not to move to the UK:

    Distance between Denver, Colorado and Columbus, Ohio: 1161 miles

    Distance between Denver, Colorado and London, UK: 4694 miles

    and yes, I know I wouldn't necessarily live in London, but I wanted to keep the pattern of capital cities. :P
  • Touch the cow. Do it now.
    Not that I don't like a little snark, I just wish it would be dialed back some.
  • edited 2012-12-17 13:01:16
    i do not understand

    what is the point of existing
    whose fault is it that i exist

  • imagei will watch the heck outta this pumpkin patch
    I... feel like we've been snarkier than this.  I dunno.

    I daresay I'm hypersensitive to snark aimed in my particular direction.
  • snark sounds like the name of a villain

    but a villain of the useless kind. like "mwaha i am snark and i am here to destroy the world"

    but he doesn't because he is defeated in a single minute
  • I think the problem is that the snark has become "DUR HUR LOOK AT ME DISLIKE THIS POPULAR THING I'M SO MUCH SMARTER THAN THE PEOPLEZ WHO LIEK IT"
  • imagei will watch the heck outta this pumpkin patch
    For the snark was a boojum, you see.
  • edited 2012-12-17 13:05:25
    boojum is that one fat retarded guy, you know

    he's so fat yoour hits don't damage him and you can't beat him. but then you learn magic or throw a slice of pizza and his weak point shows and you win

    i thought snark was trying to sound smart by being an asshole
  • Kexruct said:

    I think the problem is that the snark has become "DUR HUR LOOK AT ME DISLIKE THIS POPULAR THING I'M SO MUCH SMARTER THAN THE PEOPLEZ WHO LIEK IT"

    if this was true i would be like the smartest person in the world



    which of course i am
  • My dreams exceed my real life
    Why watch anime that isn't Goro Goro Iki.

    Why
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
    Sometimes I'm tempted to say "if you get to snark at SJWs, I get to snark at political cartoons" but I'm worried it would quickly turn into a discussion of the politics instead of the mediocrity of the cartoons themselves and I don't really feel like getting into that.

    Because frankly, snarking at SJWs and snarking at political cartoons both strike me as beating dead horses by now, but the latter is mildly more entertaining to me personally.
  • imagei will watch the heck outta this pumpkin patch
    A man's hit points are through his stomach.

  • snark is trying to sound smart by being an asshole
    ftfy
  • READ MY CROSS SHIPPING-FANFICTION, DAMMIT!

    i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
    "The fact that no one was putting up gay porn on my computer every time I got out of my seat lulled me into a false sense of security."
    Pffft.

  • but he's so fat you can't hit his stomach or his balls. so pizza is the only way

    pizza, btw, is the name of cyborg from a warrior planet created to protect this cyborg with the function of purifying evil negative energy. he pilots a ship which he can fuse himself with and turn into a robot
  • Sometimes I'm tempted to say "if you get to snark at SJWs, I get to snark at political cartoons" but I'm worried it would quickly turn into a discussion of the politics instead of the mediocrity of the cartoons themselves and I don't really feel like getting into that.

    Because frankly, snarking at SJWs and snarking at political cartoons both strike me as beating dead horses by now, but the latter is mildly more entertaining to me personally.
    This seems fair. What I've noticed is that politcl cartuns rarely elicit a better reaction than "I agree with this," so using them for snark should be fine.
  • edited 2012-12-17 13:09:55
    Justice42 said:

    "The fact that no one was putting up gay porn on my computer every time I got out of my seat lulled me into a false sense of security."
    Pffft.

    They were doing it last Friday.

    Granted, it was softcore, but seeing a guy playing with his nipples when I turned my monitor on was... ahem. Not pretty.
  • edited 2012-12-17 13:11:03
    imagei will watch the heck outta this pumpkin patch
    See I was bothered by the snarking at social justice bloggers to begin with because it seemed so meanspirited that I suspected overgeneralizations and conclusion-jumping were at work.  Then I started actually reading tumblr and seeing how people were being treated and I started to feel like maybe a little snark was deserved.

    On the other hand political cartoons are usually pretty abysmal regardless of political content.
  • edited 2012-12-17 13:11:07
    READ MY CROSS SHIPPING-FANFICTION, DAMMIT!

    i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
    Political cartoons are the absolute dregs of cartooning, you'd be pretty hard pressed to create a real argument over discussing how shitty they are.
  • This one was pretty great though:
    image
  • READ MY CROSS SHIPPING-FANFICTION, DAMMIT!

    i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
    image

    I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON UP THERE BUT SUDDENLY I AM MAD AT EVREYTHING!
  • seriously political cartoonists

    obama's ears are big

    okay

    i get it

    but that joke got old when you first said it, what six years ago?
  • imagei will watch the heck outta this pumpkin patch
    It's a stock caricature.

    Otherwise how would the ignorant public realize he was Obama?
  • maybe his opinions then?

    or they could just stop pretending they ever had any subtlety and give him devil horns or something
  • edited 2012-12-17 13:17:13
    READ MY CROSS SHIPPING-FANFICTION, DAMMIT!

    i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
    "I say! That political cartoon has inserted a random black person behind that podium...and he seems to be talking about..."presidential concerns"? That won't do, everyone KNOWS our President is Mr. Obama, not just any black tom, dick or harry, off the street. I can't tell if this political cartoon is addressing the president or race concerns!"
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
    a8 said:

    See I was bothered by the snarking at social justice bloggers to begin with because it seemed so meanspirited that I suspected overgeneralizations and conclusion-jumping were at work.  Then I started actually reading tumblr and seeing how people were being treated and I started to feel like maybe a little snark was deserved.

    Funny, I think the opposite happened for me. I immersed myself in Tumblr for about a year and saw the way people were being treated and the way certain bloggers tried to stomp out actual discourse and I found it worthy of some level of mockery, but once people started going full-steam with it I was like "wait, I think there are some overgeneralizations going on here."
  • My dreams exceed my real life
    image
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
    Here's a pretty recent one that gets me:

    image
    Regardless of the statement he's trying to make...how does that comparison make sense? The US Postal Service and an iPhone don't serve remotely the same function, except for the very vague idea of enabling communication.
  • Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast
    Ramirez is one of those small gubbermint types but the point hes trying to make is that GUBBERMINT BAD, PRIVATE ENTERPRISE GOOD.
  • edited 2012-12-17 13:22:20
    You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
    Is it creepy to look at my boyfriend's home on Google Street View?

    I was looking through my emails to find the address to send his package to, and Gmail "helpfully" adds a Google Maps link for any email with a street address in it...

    ^ Did you even read my post?
  • READ MY CROSS SHIPPING-FANFICTION, DAMMIT!

    i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
    Odradek said:

    image

    YES! 
  • Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast


    ^ Did you even read my post?
    Yeah and I thought you gave Ramirez more credit that he deserved.

    The Lorry is supposed to be representative of the US Federal Government as a whole, not the postal service.
  • It's funny, because I thought he was going for "iPhone BAD traditional stuff GOOD." 

    And there's the problem with political cartoons. There's usually at least two ways of reading them, and both are stupid.
  • READ MY CROSS SHIPPING-FANFICTION, DAMMIT!

    i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
    Here's a pretty recent one that gets me:

    image
    Regardless of the statement he's trying to make...how does that comparison make sense? The US Postal Service and an iPhone don't serve remotely the same function, except for the very vague idea of enabling communication.
    Just uhhh...

    What is the point of this?

    Instead of giving money to the post office everyone should get free iPhones?!


    This is why I hate political cartoons. They're SUPPOSE to be the simplest things in the world, and often time I look at them and I have no idea what's trying to be communicated to me.
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022

    The Lorry is supposed to be representative of the US Federal Government as a whole, not the postal service.

    *headdesk*

    Yeah, I got that much, Sherlock. What I'm saying is that Ramirez's analogy doesn't make sense because an iPhone can't replace all the functions of the postal service.
  • Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast

    The Lorry is supposed to be representative of the US Federal Government as a whole, not the postal service.

    *headdesk*

    Yeah, I got that much, Sherlock. What I'm saying is that Ramirez's analogy doesn't make sense because an iPhone can't replace all the functions of the postal service.
    Yeah, except thats not the point Ramirez is actually trying to make (I think).
  • Another problem is that they're usually symbolic, but the non symbolic parts simply don't work. I saw a bumper sticker once that showed the Obama campaign logo on a cherry with a caption that said "The weed of Socialism bears a poisonous fruit" and all I could think was WEEDS DON'T BEAR FRUIT MORON.
  • READ MY CROSS SHIPPING-FANFICTION, DAMMIT!

    i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
    YOU WANT SEND PACKAGE?! OK PLEASE TAKE PHOTO AND E-MAIL TO ME, I WILL UPLOAD TO iTABLE AND OPEN IT!
  • You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022

    Yeah, except thats not the point Ramirez is actually trying to make (I think).

    Did you miss the part where I EXPLICITLY SAID I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT THE POINT HE'S ACTUALLY TRYING TO MAKE.
  • imagei will watch the heck outta this pumpkin patch

    Funny, I think the opposite happened for me. I immersed myself in Tumblr for about a year and saw the way people were being treated and the way certain bloggers tried to stomp out actual discourse and I found it worthy of some level of mockery, but once people started going full-steam with it I was like "wait, I think there are some overgeneralizations going on here."


    Well, like I said I think I'm hypersensitive to snark aimed in my direction.

    Here's a confession: when Cygan, Anne Beeche and others started raising social justice-related points on TvT a while back, and others pointed out goons who'd levelled similar criticisms at the site, I felt kind of validated, like I was normal and the community was at fault, and like it was suddenly OK to express opinions I had previously thought would just be laughed down.

    Whereas here, conversely, I kind of felt like my core values were under fire, like it was my responsibility to say something in the name of doing the right thing and being a decent human being.

    Besides that I generally don't like to assume large groups of people are just crazy.  I feel that behaviours and practices that seem weird or attention-seeking from an external perspective, if happening on a large enough scale, likely seemed quite rational from the perspectives of those responsible.

    But my current perception is that, within tumblr, it's gotten to the point where it's actually quite difficult to express a minority political opinion or even to attempt to discuss anything because people are afraid of being pounced upon by self-righteous "allies" who don't seem to care even if they're persecuting the very people on whose behalf they presume to speak.
  • Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast

    Yeah, except thats not the point Ramirez is actually trying to make (I think).

    Did you miss the part where I EXPLICITLY SAID I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT THE POINT HE'S ACTUALLY TRYING TO MAKE.
    Obviously.
  • edited 2012-12-17 13:32:18
    imagei will watch the heck outta this pumpkin patch
    #and then bobby was a social justice blogger
  • The biggest problem is that Tumblr is deeply divided and that both sides hate each other, mainly because the nature of the internet makes it difficult to see people you disagree with as human.
  • edited 2012-12-17 13:33:39
    imagei will watch the heck outta this pumpkin patch
    Yes, and that's a problem in no way specific to tumblr, either.
Sign In or Register to comment.