You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
I have officially used three DAWs: Reaper, GarageBand and ACID.
Never used Audacity for music though.
(Except for one time where I was trying to get Waffles finished and my sister so nicely kicked me off of our laptop while I was recording -- hence, I had to use my Acer netbook to get it done, and that is why Waffles is in mono).
I have officially used three DAWs: Reaper, GarageBand and ACID.
Never used Audacity for music though.
(Except for one time where I was trying to get Waffles finished and my sister so nicely kicked me off of our laptop while I was recording -- hence, I had to use my Acer netbook to get it done, and that is why Waffles is in mono).
REAPER made me wanna cut myself. I'm never touching that thing again.
I only used it once. Wasn't terrible, though I only really used it to sequence a few pre-made samples from an iOS app in that one shitty song.
I'd use it again, not bad.
I kind of want to use Logic (since it's GarageBand's big bro) but that would require me to own a Mac (and we still don't have mine out of the shop even though it's been like a MONTH).
Whatever "your last thing" is, it will generally suck in your own eyes.
I liked D76, even if it was rather obviously unpolished. It was still good for a first attempt at music ever.
Also you should spend more time revising your pieces if you want some of the small amount of helpful advice I could possibly give you. In my experience, more time spent on a piece = more quality the piece has when finished.
Yeah, I'm probably going to try to work a bit longer on Id. It'll be short even if I did make it an "album", plus this time I've got less of that mindset where I felt like I needed to get something out.
D76... was kinda blah but there's some merit to it though; it's much more "me" than the really old stuff I did in GarageBand in 2008 (when my strategy was repeating Apple loops ad infinitum, lol12yrold) and I still legitimately love Anorak Ave.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Remember back in the 50s when they'd record like Elvis singing YOU AIN'T NOTHIN BUT A HOUND DOG and then they'd turn the record over and reverse it and it was all NYERP NYERP NYERP NYERP NYERP and people were all like, "That is actually the voice of Satan coming from that song."
Why does Lumine's Balrog avatar look strangely fitting for Imi?
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
An American gunsmith has become the first person to construct and shoot a pistol partly made out of plastic, 3D-printed parts. The creator, user HaveBlue from the AR-15 forum, has reportedly fired 200 rounds with his part-plastic pistol without any sign of wear and tear.HaveBlue’s custom creation is a .22-caliber pistol, formed from a 3D-printed AR-15 (M16) lower receiver, and a normal, commercial upper. In other words, the main body of the gun is plastic, while the chamber — where the bullets are actually struck — is solid metal.The lower receiver was created using a fairly old school Stratasys 3D printer, using a normal plastic resin. HaveBlue estimates that it cost around $30 of resin to create the lower receiver, but “Makerbots and the other low cost printers exploding onto the market would bring the cost down to perhaps $10.” Commercial, off-the-shelf assault rifle lower receivers are a lot more expensive. If you want to print your own AR-15 lower receiver, HaveBlue has uploaded the schematic to Thingiverse.HaveBlue tried to use the same lower receiver to make a full-blown .223 AR-15/M16 rifle, but it didn’t work. Funnily enough, he thinks the off-the-shelf parts are causing issues, rather than the 3D-printed part.While this pistol obviously wasn’t created from scratch using a 3D printer, the interesting thing is that the lower receiver — in a legal sense at least — is what actually constitutes a firearm. Without a lower receiver, the gun would not work; thus, the receiver is the actual legally-controlled part.In short, this means that people without gun licenses — or people who have had their licenses revoked — could print their own lower receiver and build a complete, off-the-books gun. What a chilling thought.
Comments
Are you okay with being the Empress of Heaperia?
@Lumine
How can I do that? I'm male.
...
That was a really stupid joke.
*headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk*
hey
hey kex
can i have a character too? :3
I actually thought that, like, the leader of your province would be a retired guard of my Barony, or something if that's okay with you.
Yes.
yes that sounds hella cool.
I'm not surprised people consider it their best album now, it was amazing.
I am finally capable of musicking semi-competently in FL Studio.
It takes a lot longer than it ever did in Audacity, but that's alright.
In a very limited, very manualized capacity, yes.
It's generally not recommended that you actually do, though.
Never used Audacity for music though.
(Except for one time where I was trying to get Waffles finished and my sister so nicely kicked me off of our laptop while I was recording -- hence, I had to use my Acer netbook to get it done, and that is why Waffles is in mono).
This song has the creepiest fucking music video.
No i will not link to it this late at night. You'll thank me later, probably.
I wanna know what kind of person puts samples intended for FL Studio in .flac format which cannot be read by FL Studio.
REAPER made me wanna cut myself. I'm never touching that thing again.I'd use it again, not bad.
I kind of want to use Logic (since it's GarageBand's big bro) but that would require me to own a Mac (and we still don't have mine out of the shop even though it's been like a MONTH).
(understatement.)
I should get working on Identified. Kinda thought the project wasn't going forward after I realized my last thing sucked but hey, I guess not.
Whatever "your last thing" is, it will generally suck in your own eyes.
I liked D76, even if it was rather obviously unpolished. It was still good for a first attempt at music ever.
Also you should spend more time revising your pieces if you want some of the small amount of helpful advice I could possibly give you. In my experience, more time spent on a piece = more quality the piece has when finished.
D76... was kinda blah but there's some merit to it though; it's much more "me" than the really old stuff I did in GarageBand in 2008 (when my strategy was repeating Apple loops ad infinitum, lol12yrold) and I still legitimately love Anorak Ave.
I dunno, but either way it'll still be a thing by me. So yeah.
YNTKT
become the first person to construct and shoot a pistol partly made out
of plastic, 3D-printed parts. The creator, user HaveBlue from the AR-15
forum, has reportedly fired 200 rounds with his part-plastic pistol
without any sign of wear and tear.HaveBlue’s custom creation
is a .22-caliber pistol, formed from a 3D-printed AR-15 (M16) lower
receiver, and a normal, commercial upper. In other words, the main body
of the gun is plastic, while the chamber — where the bullets are
actually struck — is solid metal.The lower receiver was created
using a fairly old school Stratasys 3D printer, using a normal plastic
resin. HaveBlue estimates that it cost around $30 of resin to create the
lower receiver, but “Makerbots and the other low cost printers
exploding onto the market would bring the cost down to perhaps $10.”
Commercial, off-the-shelf assault rifle lower receivers are a lot more
expensive. If you want to print your own AR-15 lower receiver, HaveBlue
has uploaded the schematic to Thingiverse.HaveBlue tried to use the same lower receiver to make a full-blown .223 AR-15/M16 rifle, but it didn’t work. Funnily enough, he thinks the off-the-shelf parts are causing issues, rather than the 3D-printed part.While this pistol obviously
wasn’t created from scratch using a 3D printer, the interesting thing is
that the lower receiver — in a legal sense at least
— is what actually constitutes a firearm. Without a lower receiver, the
gun would not work; thus, the receiver is the actual legally-controlled
part.In short, this means that people without gun licenses — or
people who have had their licenses revoked — could print their own lower
receiver and build a complete, off-the-books gun. What a chilling
thought.