I just don’t think it’s funny or deserves six seasons.
(*
This is actually my whole take on it, actually
What the takes-everything-literally-in-the-Bible folks don't understand is that religious texts aren't banned from metaphor. Come to think of it, atheists trying to set up a logic trap around the passage stating "the four corners of the earth" don't understand this, either
i watched it for 15 minutes once while i was at a laundromat and it is the worst thing that ever happened to me even including being beaten by my mother when she was drunk
Remember back in the 50s when they'd record like Elvis singing YOU AIN'T NOTHIN BUT A HOUND DOG and then they'd turn the record over and reverse it and it was all NYERP NYERP NYERP NYERP NYERP and people were all like, "That is actually the voice of Satan coming from that song."
I've watched three episodes of it. It's not really to my liking, but I wouldn't say it's rage-inducing. Then again, very few things seem to be rage-inducing for me.
One thing about it does bother me, though. Why, of all people, does Sheldon Cooper seem to be the most popular character? I almost couldn't stand him; he was so obnoxious.
And some people apparently compare their autistic friends to him as a compliment. I'd say you have every right be offended if someone did that. >:|
It's just that you can't set your standards very high when you're dealing with a sitcom.
i dont set my standards very high for sitcoms. my only standard is that i expect there to be some jokes, at some point.
the big bang theory does not meet that standard.
define "joke"
something that, at least, has more substance to it than 'he is a science! he does science!!! *canned laughter*'
How much of this show have you seen, though?
im not saying that it is totally absolutely worthless. i mean if you played a whole series to me i would probably chuckle at least once. but i have seen enough of it to know that it is not worth my while and that the main crux of the shows humour just seems to be 'they do science. science is funny'. its not exactly monty python. my boyfriends flatmates last year had the tv on all the time. there was this, and Jeremy Kyle, and Geordie Shore, and Made In Chelsea. i would prefer those three in front of the big bang theory, at least they have the car-crash TV can't-look-way quality.
Admittedly not really (AFAIK), but that's not what you said.
And I still don't know why you care.
It's just... augh. I really don't like it when people's opinions are dismissed, no matter how minor the opinion is. And yes I understand this is hypocritical.
^^ Maybe they hope that appearing in the show will encourage viewers to take an interest in actual science?
We can only hope.
Okay how about this:
"I don't personally like the show, but you have a history of getting overly upset when someone insults something you like. How about we both just accept that the show has positive traits that overshadow the negative traits for you, but personally I find it difficult to see past those flaws and find that the positive traits don't outweigh the negative ones."
Taylor Swift has won 6 Grammys, including two Album Of The Year's
Clearly she is a musician to be taken seriously.
There's a difference, though. You have to keep in mind what her competition was.
Not only that, but I wasn't saying "it won emmys you can go home now i have won the argument" I just pointed it out as something to consider before you completely dismiss it.
Comments
Honestly, I'd rather listen to a religious debate
The IT Crowd is better.
i dont set my standards very high for sitcoms. my only standard is that i expect there to be some jokes, at some point.
the big bang theory does not meet that standard.
i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
Why is it still on
im not saying that it is totally absolutely worthless. i mean if you played a whole series to me i would probably chuckle at least once. but i have seen enough of it to know that it is not worth my while and that the main crux of the shows humour just seems to be 'they do science. science is funny'. its not exactly monty python. my boyfriends flatmates last year had the tv on all the time. there was this, and Jeremy Kyle, and Geordie Shore, and Made In Chelsea. i would prefer those three in front of the big bang theory, at least they have the car-crash TV can't-look-way quality.
Like, he's actually painful to watch.
Does it matter? If you like the show nobody's stopping you watching it.
I know a number of intelligent people who enjoyed Twilight.
Scientist cameos
As the theme of the show revolves around science, many distinguished and high profile scientists have appeared as guest stars on the show. Famous astrophysicist and Nobel laureate George Smoot had a cameo appearance in episode 17 "The Terminator Decoupling", of the second season.[146] Theoretical physicist Brian Greene also appeared on the show in "The Herb Garden Germination", episode 20 of the fourth season. Astrophysicist and science populizer Neil deGrasse Tyson appeared in "The Apology Insufficiency", episode 7 of the fourth season. CosmologistStephen Hawking made a short guest appearance in the fifth-season episode "The Hawking Excitation" on April 5, 2012.[147] In the episode he meets Sheldon Cooper and points out a mistake in his new Higgs boson analysis. In the end of season 5 and the beginning of season 6 featured NASA astronaut Michael J. Massimino multiple times as himself as one of Howard's fellow astronauts.
Admittedly not really (AFAIK), but that's not what you said.
And I still don't know why you care.