the final verdict on dogs

Tatterhood · 2017-08-23 01:10:21

they're ok

Imipolex G · 2017-08-23 01:46:15

generally, yes

Fossilmaiden · 2017-08-23 01:48:03

Anonus · 2017-08-23 02:24:12

is that your dog

Fossilmaiden · 2017-08-23 02:24:52

The older of the two, yeah.

Calica · 2017-08-23 02:34:22

Tatterhood said:
they're ok

proof:

for all dogs, dogs are okay, because there is no such thing as a dogh

Klinotaxis · 2017-08-23 02:38:23

Calica said:

Tatterhood said:
they're ok
proof:

for all dogs, dogs are okay, because there is no such thing as a dogh

>2011

>caring about existential import

Calica · 2017-08-23 02:40:03

i'm going to assume the fact that dogh is highlighted in green there is a house-of-leaves*-esque mystery clue and not just you selected wrong

*i haven't actually read that book

Calica · 2017-08-23 02:40:14

anyways vacuous proofs are the best proofs

Klinotaxis · 2017-08-23 02:43:22

only because proofs are in general impossible

Tachyon · 2017-08-23 03:20:18

house of leaves was a good book

Imipolex G · 2017-08-23 03:23:11

it was pretty entertaining, I'll say that

Tachyon · 2017-08-23 03:24:27

it took me a while to finish it but i remember enjoying it

glennmagusharvey · 2017-08-23 04:09:40

Calica said:

Tatterhood said:
they're ok
proof:

for all dogs, dogs are okay, because there is no such thing as a dogh

hyperbolic dog

Tatterhood · 2018-06-26 04:56:33

glennmagusharvey said:

Calica said:

Tatterhood said:
they're ok
proof:

for all dogs, dogs are okay, because there is no such thing as a dogh
hyperbolic dog

Calica · 2018-06-26 05:13:48

glennmagusharvey said:

Calica said:

Tatterhood said:
they're ok
proof:

for all dogs, dogs are okay, because there is no such thing as a dogh
hyperbolic dog

Bee · 2018-06-26 05:59:36

inverse hyperbolic dog

the final verdict on dogs

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories