I'm worried it's not rational but I do.
For one thing, it makes its content look kind of self-important, and for another, it's not really customizable software like WordPress is. It's basically proprietary. It's like At Ease, where it's "simple" yet seemingly boxes in its users.
Comments
Medium, on the other hand, has much more of a "just write" sensibility to it, at least with my experience. You don't go there for your stuff to necessarily be unique in look or to really build your own individual brand presence (unless you're like the Awl and moved there from a previous blogging system, or you've always been a publication on the service like Backchannel), but you do use it to write it quick while still making it look nice.
I don't really get this idea that it's self-important, though. It does have a very 2010's design trend feel to it, but I don't think I understand how that's a mark of conceit.
They killed a few of the features that gave it that look (which I mourned when I ended up writing about ORT) but nevertheless I still like how my newer stuff on there looked
Although "makes its content look self-important" is maybe not so absurd, it's still an odd framing.
Well, how do you feel about Disqus comments systems on self-hosted blogs like Brand New? Tumblr-based ones (like, longform Tumblrs; they're rare but you can find them if you look)? Are those any better or worse because they're based on proprietary software that, while more open to customization than Medium, share its reliance on the owners of the respective services?
(I'm not meaning to be accusatory here, I'm just legitimately curious as to what specifically spurred your distaste. )
I don't know, I'd feel weird handing over the keys to my entire platform to Medium.