Ugly, maybe, but they were the first implementation of the system to hit the mainstream, they're the most comprehensive set of icons for the standard and (most notably) it's Apple's interpretation of it, which in and of itself gives some a reason to blindly prefer it.
With all this in mind: I like Google and HTC's interpretations better, in that order.
the worst services/platforms/sites about this are the ones that actively replace emoticons with emoji images. ugh.
often times they're not even accurate. i want a genuine and enthused ppen mouth smile and so I type :D and then the service turns it into a cheesy, teethy grin. what the hell, service
just let me stick to doing everything in plaintext so i retain control of what i input and don't have to deal with non-wysiwyg situations please is it really that hard
duplicate post, please ignore wait i can use this for something
plaintext is the same on any platform, any service, any site, and if it's simple enough, any device (provided you're using some reasonably standard font)
you can copy/paste across different mediums
you don't need fancy mouse or touchscree input (for those cases that use these)
you don't depend on extra images loading correctly or use bandwidth for anything other than text
plaintext is the most versatile and resilient and adaptible of all the formats, that's why it is the best
the worst services/platforms/sites about this are the ones that actively replace emoticons with emoji images. ugh.
often times they're not even accurate. i want a genuine and enthused ppen mouth smile and so I type :D and then the service turns it into a cheesy, teethy grin. what the hell, service
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Like Tre said, Apple was the first to bring emoji to the mainstream in America, so for a lot of people they were their first exposure to emoji.
Also, I gotta give Apple credit for trying to keep up with the changing standards...they seem to be the first mainstream operating system to support the silly skin color modifiers and whatnot.
@GMH: what you're missing is that emoji are plain text. They're standard Unicode characters that are rendered as color graphics using a special font installed locally on your phone. That's why, if you have a rooted Android device, for example, you can change what emoji you see. You're just swapping out the font file.
the worst services/platforms/sites about this are the ones that actively replace emoticons with emoji images. ugh.
often times they're not even accurate. i want a genuine and enthused ppen mouth smile and so I type :D and then the service turns it into a cheesy, teethy grin. what the hell, service
For whatever reason, Vanilla strips anything that's not in the Basic Multilingual Plane (U+000000 to U+00FFFF). I haven't really looked into how to fix this yet.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Which is a shame, because Twitter's emoji are open-source and they'd look really pretty here.
For whatever reason, Vanilla strips anything that's not in the Basic Multilingual Plane (U+000000 to U+00FFFF). I haven't really looked into how to fix this yet.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
You know how I said Apple is usually the first to update their emoji set to cover new additions to the standard?
Comments
that said I don't like them either
With all this in mind: I like Google and HTC's interpretations better, in that order.
even all that weird shit with skin color altering subcharacters is standard
the emoji codes themselves are worthless, but the emoji images they code for are generally tacky and ugly
better to stick with emoticons
often times they're not even accurate. i want a genuine and enthused ppen mouth smile and so I type :D and then the service turns it into a cheesy, teethy grin. what the hell, service
just let me stick to doing everything in plaintext so i retain control of what i input and don't have to deal with non-wysiwyg situations please is it really that hard
plaintext is the same on any platform, any service, any site, and if it's simple enough, any device (provided you're using some reasonably standard font)
you can copy/paste across different mediums
you don't need fancy mouse or touchscree input (for those cases that use these)
you don't depend on extra images loading correctly or use bandwidth for anything other than text
plaintext is the most versatile and resilient and adaptible of all the formats, that's why it is the best
Also, I gotta give Apple credit for trying to keep up with the changing standards...they seem to be the first mainstream operating system to support the silly skin color modifiers and whatnot.
@GMH: what you're missing is that emoji are plain text. They're standard Unicode characters that are rendered as color graphics using a special font installed locally on your phone. That's why, if you have a rooted Android device, for example, you can change what emoji you see. You're just swapping out the font file.
Same.
Just thought I'd put that out there.
And Nasubi really is adorable. And weird.
I mean, the pants dance.