seems like it'd be hard to be a Dawkins/Harris style atheist in a world where the gods have a direct and observable effect upon reality on a daily basis
Exactly, a measurable effect. Elder Scroll gods are not really the kind of beings one has to take a leap of faith to believe in. So atheists shouldn't have problems with them.
seems like it'd be hard to be a Dawkins/Harris style atheist in a world where the gods have a direct and observable effect upon reality on a daily basis
"It is a matter of grave importance that Fairy tales should be respected.... Whosoever alters them to suit his own opinions, whatever they are, is guilty, to our thinking, of an act of presumption, and appropriates to himself what does not belong to him." -- Charles Dickens
And couldn't having daily effects on reality make them easier to disbelieve in than a sufficient number of random miracles? I mean if occasionalism is true, people could easily believe that fire rather than God is the cause of burning, just because God is buring stuff all the time in a rational pattern.
Richard Dawkins: Respected biologist and scientist. However sometimes he thinks he can talk about philosophical issues while simultaneously being totally ignorant and dismissive of the philosophic dialog that he's talking about. When he is sticking to science or even just atheism people don't have a problem with him generally.
Christopher Hitchens: Honestly I don't know that much about him, he did basically advocate killing Islamic people though after 911, and acted like religion was the only possible cause of violent terrorism.
Dan Dennett: Not so much hated, but a lot of people think he sticks to behaviorism / reductionism to an absurd degree. Pretty much the last true behaviorist in professional philosophy. Despite this he's extremely popular with lay people who are science minded and a lot of people who know nothing about philosophy assume he's obviously right.
Bill Mayer: Nothing to do with philosophy really but he's super annoying and pretty much an idiot. Also I don't know how you can look at him and not want to punch his stupid face. Like Proud_Bum pointed out Lawrence Krauss would have been way better so I'll do him instead.
Lawrence Krauss: Like Dawkins he wants to talk about philosophic issues without understanding any counterpoints that actual philosophers raise. Dismisses all of philosophy as pointless at the same time. Presumably he can do physics well but he needs to shut up about metaphysics and philosophy (or actually read a book on them first).
Sam Harris: Writes pop philosophy books using terrible circular reasoning and ignoring any objections. Is absurdly sure of himself, regarding the moral landscape when someone asked what the best objection he heard to the ideas he said "There hasn't been any". Considering the scope of what he was claiming and the incredibly small amount of arguments he used to claim it this is just insane.
The biggest reason people hate them though is a lot of people view them as the public intellectuals of our time due to their popularity. So they spread a lot of bad philosophy into the general public.
I have to imagine that atheism in such a universe would revolve around less a disbelief in the gods and more a disbelief in their divinity.
The difference between "Jesus didn't exist" and "Jesus wasn't the son of god", in more relatable terms.
When you're dealing with things as obvious powerful and reality warping as TES gods, actual divinity is merely a semantic thing.
I'm sure it would still matter to some people, provided there are people in The Elder Scrolls Universe with time to philosophize, it's been a while since I played Morrowind and longer since I played Oblivion (not a typo).
I get the feeling Harris would try and redefine divinity out of spite specifically so that the gods wouldn't qualify. His efforts would probably end with a smiting.
Dawkins is a douche with an axe to grind, but at least pragmatic enough to go "yeah this is a thing" and view them as overpowered politicians (which they kinda are). Of course, seeing how magic is just another branch of science in a setting like that, he'd probably also be keeping his ear to the ground on running theories about the source code the gods are hacking, if not outright moonlighting as a mage.
That's why I said he'd make a good Psijic. The Psijics believe that the Daedric Princes are just spurned Aldmeri ancestors who achieved divinity through prominence in the mortal world.
Plus, the snobby Altmer mage is an archetype that suits him well.
Comments
that's a direct and measurable effect
Assassin poems, Poems that shoot
guns. Poems that wrestle cops into alleys
and take their weapons leaving them dead
☭ B̤̺͍̰͕̺̠̕u҉̖͙̝̮͕̲ͅm̟̼̦̠̹̙p͡s̹͖ ̻T́h̗̫͈̙̩r̮e̴̩̺̖̠̭̜ͅa̛̪̟͍̣͎͖̺d͉̦͠s͕̞͚̲͍ ̲̬̹̤Y̻̤̱o̭͠u̥͉̥̜͡ ̴̥̪D̳̲̳̤o̴͙̘͓̤̟̗͇n̰̗̞̼̳͙͖͢'҉͖t̳͓̣͍̗̰ ͉W̝̳͓̼͜a̗͉̳͖̘̮n͕ͅt͚̟͚ ̸̺T̜̖̖̺͎̱ͅo̭̪̰̼̥̜ ̼͍̟̝R̝̹̮̭ͅͅe̡̗͇a͍̘̤͉͘d̼̜ ⚢
I think Talos hates elves, or Talos' blessing doesn't work on high elves so that's why they think he's not a god.
The difference between "Jesus didn't exist" and "Jesus wasn't the son of god", in more relatable terms.
Anyway, divinity in TES really has more to do with being sufficiently powerful than with any big concepts
Dawkins is a douche with an axe to grind, but at least pragmatic enough to go "yeah this is a thing" and view them as overpowered politicians (which they kinda are). Of course, seeing how magic is just another branch of science in a setting like that, he'd probably also be keeping his ear to the ground on running theories about the source code the gods are hacking, if not outright moonlighting as a mage.