I can't remember the details, but as I recall one of the people heavily involved in the "stop molestia" thing turned out to have a rapey shota side pornblog and came up with all kinds of bullshit about how that was OK.
I have tons of kinks but most are either boring or in the "weird but not weird enough that I could talk to the other people with weird kinks about them" category.
I have tons of kinks but most are either boring or in the "weird but not weird enough that I could talk to the other people with weird kinks about them" category.
I can't remember the details, but as I recall one of the people heavily involved in the "stop molestia" thing turned out to have a rapey shota side pornblog and came up with all kinds of bullshit about how that was OK.
Ewwww.
Granted, if it was listed as "adult" then it was at least properly categorised, but that's still hella gross.
i change my mind 4chan should destroy this website
It's not like the sonic screwdriver can actually work as an offensive weapon... and why on earth would Dean or Thor want to waste their time murdering 4channers?
More people have said that and been killed than there are thorium decay products.
Maybe I am going to start a side blog comprised entirely of art depicting: lolicon, shota, guro, rape, and bestiality, and there will be nothing anyone can do about it. :o
If you have ever wondered why/how the unknown pleasures cover graphic ended up getting plastered all over shirts it's cuz Raf Simons worked with Peter Saville for his f/w 2003 collection
Maybe I am going to start a side blog comprised entirely of art depicting: lolicon, shota, guro, rape, and bestiality, and there will be nothing anyone can do about it. :o
I don't want to jump to conclusions and be nasty, but if you sincerely think that flipping the bird to censorship justifies something like that, then I don't want to share a forum with you.
Maybe I am going to start a side blog comprised entirely of art depicting: lolicon, shota, guro, rape, and bestiality, and there will be nothing anyone can do about it. :o
provided that any illegal acts were depocted in an artistic fashion and not actually being performed by actual persons i would be most likely internally displeased but would not express a negative reaction
It never for one moment crossed my mind that Miko might be referring to depictions of illegal acts performed by actual people, and I don't believe Miko would say anything of the sort.
But a blog featuring 'artistic' depictions of child pornography is still way over the line.
Yes. i guess what i mean to say is that i think i would tend to err on the cautious side when it comes to judging the moral qualities of art but i completely understand why one would not.
Ugh. I'm not trying to be 'goony' or whatever, and I'm sorry if that's how I sound. This isn't the first time Miko has made posts suggesting she doesn't take this issue seriously, or even the second time.
I guess I would just really like her to seriously consider what she said and whether she seriously thinks she'd be justified in doing something so supremely irresponsible.
TBH I was tentative about even raising the subject because I know that this is not a conversation anyone wants to have, which I'm guessing is why Miko's remark provoked no response.
It's not at all a nice subject, but it's not the kind of thing that should pass without comment.
Knowing Miko I know she wasn't serious about it. Then again know that she like to see reaction around here I think. And yeah, I understand why such topic should be rather be avoided because how it's a emotional topic.
Comments
(*shrug*)
4channers claiming their goal is to “make the tumblr tag system useless”
in their next raid, 4chan starts some fires on a volcano
(*washes hands after typing*)
Just wondering
Assassin poems, Poems that shoot
guns. Poems that wrestle cops into alleys
and take their weapons leaving them dead
Assassin poems, Poems that shoot
guns. Poems that wrestle cops into alleys
and take their weapons leaving them dead
that movie was amazing
falls down, cut in half by ninja sord
and now u know
I don't want to jump to conclusions and be nasty, but if you sincerely think that flipping the bird to censorship justifies something like that, then I don't want to share a forum with you.
But a blog featuring 'artistic' depictions of child pornography is still way over the line.
On that count, the sexualized depiction of child abuse is at the very least questionable.
I guess I would just really like her to seriously consider what she said and whether she seriously thinks she'd be justified in doing something so supremely irresponsible.
It's not at all a nice subject, but it's not the kind of thing that should pass without comment.
And yeah, I understand why such topic should be rather be avoided because how it's a emotional topic.