› ›

Should Warner City California even exist?

AnonusAnonus
edited 2016-06-08 05:21:58 in Chocolate
I plan on building Warner City Florida, a theme park/hotel/studio complex, in an area roughly adjacent to Walt Disney World, Universal Orlando Resort, and SeaWorld Orlando. I plan on building Warner City Colorado, which is much the same thing but with ABC Warner's corporate headquarters and rides built with "winter modes," in a rural area not far from Denver International Airport.

But Warner City California? How would I justify its existence? Especially as Disneyland and Universal Studios Hollywood's Florida counterparts have risen above them in attendance and importance - and ABC Warner already has plenty of telegenic regional presence in SoCal.

Comments

  • Salix BabylonikaSalix Babylonika
    https://i.imgur.com/IoGc2jA.jpg
    if Dr. Dre can buy California I see no reason you can't buy only a part of it.
  • AnonusAnonus
    I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    well like would some of the purposes end up being dumb? (e.g. facilities for Warner Bros. Animation Group, ESPN, possibly ABC News/CNN, and Reakt so as to make Nickelodeon wish they hadn't closed Nickelodeon Studios)
  • TreTre
    image
    Anonus. Think.

    Cartoon Network, as a theme park.

    I would kill for that.
  • AnonusAnonus
    I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    I was already planning attractions based on Adventure Time, Steven Universe, and The Powerpuff Girls (and, if they count, The Flintstones and Scooby-Doo) for the parks.
  • AnonusAnonus
    edited 2016-06-08 06:02:57
    I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
    And there's at least two parks anyway (the ones in Florida and Colorado, which is admittedly something of a longshot anyway because unlike the Orlando or LA areas, the Denver area is a semi-arid climate that also gets more snow in the winter than Orlando or LA do)
Sign In or Register to comment.