honestly it's hard for me to really pinpoint how I feel about Zack Snyder because he gets things right a lot but not enough to ward off the effect of his missteps
300 still gets points for me for its memetic status and the fact that it was the first R-rated film I remember seeing in a theater (with my dad) but I honestly can't say with confidence that it was a great movie. I'd have to watch it again to truly pass judgment and I figure the chances of it standing the test of time are pretty slim.
Watchmen was pretty good for what it was, but the problem with it was the fact that it was a two-and-a-half-hour blockbuster film and that wasn't enough time to do the comics justice. It probably would have worked better as a multi-part film or a miniseries. (The Ultimate Cut, which I haven't seen, is a whopping 215 minutes long!)
Sucker Punch... I haven't seen all of it, but what I did see was too incoherent for its own good. Had some killer action sequences, but the concept killed any possibility of them actually having weight. (Not sure if I felt the same way back when I was watching it, but the depiction of mental illness was not the greatest thing in the world either.)
Man of Steel was decent, but incongruous. It made very little attempt to match itself up with the public perception of Superman (colorful, larger-than-life, practically infallible, y'know, The Cape) and italmost felt like what would happen if you tried to make a Batman film with Superman as the protagonist as a result of that.
also, I'm firmly of the opinion that this film's premise is a horrible idea, especially as a means of introducing Affleck-Batman to audiences, and the reports of its cast make me feel like it's going to be all over the place in terms of story
like, I get how they could get Wonder Woman on board, but then there's Aquaman and Flash and Lex Luthor and Doomsday and ugh what the fuck
It's giving me an edgy crossover fanfic vibe. I may give it a chance once it's available on The Pirate Bay DVD, but I don't see myself rushing to the theater to catch it.
In terms of Zach Snyder, I've seen 300 and Watchmen and they are absolutely not my thing.
If what Myr says about Watchmen being more faithful to the comics then people give it credit for is true, then it honestly makes me less inclined to read the comic.
Watchmen the comic is really, *really* good, but a good chunk of the film is told in documents and flashbacks, which are very hard to translate to film. Even harder to bring over is the through-line about the history of comics in this alternate America where superheroes never became a thing in fiction because they were already a thing in real life.
That said, while tonally very Snyder (and this does take a toll on the message of the book), the theatrical cut of the film is, in terms of events and sequencing, actually very faithful to the main events and how they unfold. The big change is in the nature of the disaster in New York and who gets blamed for what, which both simplifies and complicates certain things. Apparently the three-hour version is even more accurate overall, and captures the feeling of the original book and that genuine deconstructive edge a lot better, but I can't say that for certain.
I meant that in the sense that encountering actual depth rather than the illusion of depth in a teen action show would throw them for a loop if they weren't too thick or literal-minded to get it.
Comments