i found it in a compilation at a tender young age and thought it sounded like the work of a crotchety old republican political cartoonist so I never read another thing of Vonnegut's
Man is a most complex simple creature: see what he weaves, and how base his reasons for doing so.
The appeal is that you can now fucking engineer out all human weakness because Rob Rhineheart is afraid of kitchens and feels that cooking is an experience analogous to being tortured.
i found it in a compilation at a tender young age and thought it sounded like the work of a crotchety old republican political cartoonist so I never read another thing of Vonnegut's
What's funny is "crotchety old Republican" is about as far from Vonnegut as you can get.
Yes, that's a reasonable interpretation to draw from "Harrison Bergeron", but the story's really a huge outlier in Vonnegut's work. So much so that some critics try to argue that Vonnegut was secretly mocking the viewpoint that the story was allegedly pushing. You know, a "stealth parody".
start with the premise that you put zero effort into eating. you eat as cheaply as you can, either in the form of fast food, or buying instant ramen that's half salt in bulk.
with that restriction, something that is supposedly actually nutritious is a huge improvement
i found it in a compilation at a tender young age and thought it sounded like the work of a crotchety old republican political cartoonist so I never read another thing of Vonnegut's
What's funny is "crotchety old Republican" is about as far from Vonnegut as you can get.
Yes, that's a reasonable interpretation to draw from "Harrison Bergeron", but the story's really a huge outlier in Vonnegut's work. So much so that some critics try to argue that Vonnegut was secretly mocking the viewpoint that the story was allegedly pushing. You know, a "stealth parody".
Pretty much this. Aside from his scepticism about abstract art trends of the '60s-'70s (which came from a different place than the typical conservative critique anyway), he was pretty progressive and held no truck with things like trickle-down economics.
The appeal is that you can now fucking engineer out all human weakness because Rob Rhineheart is afraid of kitchens and feels that cooking is an experience analogous to being tortured.
that bit in cyberchase where they were cooking the souffles
I disagree. It's an interesting point, and while I love to eat and love to cook, I can understand the particular brand of neurosis on display here even if it is, indeed, a neurosis.
I'm really not a fan of how patronizing that article is, never mind how it overcomplicates what are, to me, overall basic and easy things to do (provided you can walk on to the store and get all that you need for meal prep, etc).
I'm not very hot on Soylent, since it's just not my style, but some of those arguing against it definitely aren't convincing me that it is Just Bad, or what-have-you. Of course it'd be better without mold or risk of mold, which is just kinda dumb.
^^^ Not "above" eating, just doesn't enjoy it and would rather be doing something more enjoyable.
You have this habit of projecting contempt for your life choices on things that you strongly disagree with or don't understand. AU does it, too, and it honestly weirds me out and strikes me as... unhealthy.
>"But cooking is fun!" you say. Wow. Wrong. Cooking is a tedious process that can result in you stabbing yourself or burning your house down. It's awful.
^^^ Not "above" eating, just doesn't enjoy it and would rather be doing something more enjoyable.
You have this habit of projecting contempt for your life choices on things that you strongly disagree with or don't understand. AU does it, too, and it honestly weirds me out and strikes me as... unhealthy.
If you can read that article as not being contemptuous than you are simply infinitely more patient with people than I am.
^^^ Not "above" eating, just doesn't enjoy it and would rather be doing something more enjoyable.
You have this habit of projecting contempt for your life choices on things that you strongly disagree with or don't understand. AU does it, too, and it honestly weirds me out and strikes me as... unhealthy.
If you can read that article as not being contemptuous than you are simply infinitely more patient with people than I am.
This is not the best example, but it is certainly not the first. I have no intention of reading you the Riot Act over something that really doesn't affect anyone here, but you're getting mad bitter over someone else's weird hangups.
^^^ Not "above" eating, just doesn't enjoy it and would rather be doing something more enjoyable.
You have this habit of projecting contempt for your life choices on things that you strongly disagree with or don't understand. AU does it, too, and it honestly weirds me out and strikes me as... unhealthy.
If you can read that article as not being contemptuous than you are simply infinitely more patient with people than I am.
This is not the best example, but it is certainly not the first. I have no intention of reading you the Riot Act over something that really doesn't affect anyone here, but you're getting mad bitter over someone else's weird hangups.
^ Exactly. I feel kind of bad for them.
I'm not "bitter", it just pissed me off and I don't want to read any more of it.
You have a habit of assuming I'm way madder than I actually am.
Attempting to show a sense of humour about their product, although they might have missed the mark.
The thing about Rob Rhinehart is that he already exhibits a classic engineers' arrogance (as exhibited here), so naming his product "Soylent" just comes off as trying to seriously play God rather than being a joke.
But it tastes like ass and in my case would result in more thrown up than ingested. Turns out shoving a bunch of essential vitamins, proteins, and assorted nutrients into a chunky slurry that resembles something your infant son spit up does not constitute food. I'll stick to the risk of stabbing myself and/or burning my house down, because unlike the writer of that article, I'm not one of those dipshits in a 90's cell phone commercial who fucking hogties himself in his phone cord.
I'm not even a particularly good cook, but Jesus Christ people.
Does sound like something useful for mountain climbing or emergency aid or something, but ultimately it's not food -- it's feed.
Comments
i found it in a compilation at a tender young age and thought it sounded like the work of a crotchety old republican political cartoonist so I never read another thing of Vonnegut's
after all, at least Mallard Fillmore has some sex appeal
I thought there was a subreddit for everything
with that restriction, something that is supposedly actually nutritious is a huge improvement
Pretty much this. Aside from his scepticism about abstract art trends of the '60s-'70s (which came from a different place than the typical conservative critique anyway), he was pretty progressive and held no truck with things like trickle-down economics.
it got sorta weird towards the end there
You have this habit of projecting contempt for your life choices on things that you strongly disagree with or don't understand. AU does it, too, and it honestly weirds me out and strikes me as... unhealthy.
i can kinda relate to this part
this part seemed like a fair point:
well i mean, eating is kinda gross when you stop and think about it
i mean soylent actually seems a lot grosser to me than regular food, but still
flavour is the good part about eating things
why would you take away the good part
I can't eat milkshakes without wanting to throw up, so I can't imagine being able to ingest soylent.
but idk if that makes the author of that article contemptuous for pointing that out
it sounds more like for whatever reason they've got stuck on the idea and can't *not* think about that
This is not the best example, but it is certainly not the first. I have no intention of reading you the Riot Act over something that really doesn't affect anyone here, but you're getting mad bitter over someone else's weird hangups.
^ Exactly. I feel kind of bad for them.
like who in their right mind names their product 'soylent'
just, why
you don't joke about something like that and still expect me to ingest your product
just no. NO.
which it does, because that's what it is
not much irony there, it's a plain fact, the product is indeed horrible
so he gave it a name that suggests it's even more horrible, to make it even less appealing
???
but that doesn't make me want to try it