Is someone who has never played a game in their life really going to get much out of The Stanley Parable? People always just seem to choose the "games as art" candidates and not the kind of games someone who isn't good at video games might be able to play and enjoy.
Comments
Like, if someone were to only ever play one game, Undertale would be a strong contender, but I wouldn't recommend it for anyone's first game.
I wouldn't exactly recommend it to someone who's never played games before either but it could be not disastrous.
We need more games explictly aimed at newbies. Final Fantasy: Mystic Quest gets a bad rap.
The first game anyone should play is Super Goddamn Mario World.
In terms of "adult" games or whatever: Riven.
Master of the Elements is on the borderline between the two because it's surprisingly hardcore for a children's puzzle game.
Basically I feel like someone's first game should be some kind of platformer standard. I may be prejudiced in this
It might have been The Lion King which is probably not the best introduction to video games actually.
But I always forget to account for the hours I spent playing Pac-Man in old arcade boxes.
First RPG was Pokémon though.
It had a very memorable theme song.
Though looking it up now I definitely did not remember how bad the character art looked.
Assassin poems, Poems that shoot
guns. Poems that wrestle cops into alleys
and take their weapons leaving them dead
Simpsonskids have since informed me those are bad games, despite my actual physical experiences with them
Assassin poems, Poems that shoot
guns. Poems that wrestle cops into alleys
and take their weapons leaving them dead
"People have decided that this game isn't good anymore!" is a take I quite dislike. I have a lot of opinions on the nature of something aging well