Plot holes are important if they detract from the audience's sense of immersion.
There are some things that could be counted as plot holes if one is more nitpicky, or counted as details left to interpretation by the audience if one is less nitpicky.
There is definitely a beauty in a setting being so comprehensively fleshed out that every little detail is developed.
But at the same time there is also a beauty in not knowing certain things, or certain things being left up to the audience's imagination -- and often, subsequent discussion and even arguments.
If we want to serious talk about it, People can't invest in a series that has too many plot-holes, when the internal consistency of a work is whatever the composer wants it to be, eventually people will lose interest as there's no creative strides being broken.... Mind you, you'll still make like 40 million dollars before that happens, so sure, in the capitalistic sense of the word, Plot Holes are like a duck wearing a lemon costume.
> when the internal consistency of a work is whatever the composer wants it to be,
Well, actually, to be fair, there are some circumstances in which self-contradicting contexts could make sense. But they're pretty specific. Not something to be used without reason or by accident.
> eventually people will lose interest as there's no creative strides being broken....
ugh why am i thinking of this as basically saying that only new things are entertaining
Actually, I have interpreted this thread to mean that, in reality, Glenn, when you talk about people having a "bigger problem" who would you classify as having a "bigger problem?"
There are in for reasonable debate purposes, two sides when it comes to fiction, there is the creator side and the audience side.
And the audience side is very forgiving of pieces with plot holes and plot contridictions if the story has things that attract them.
The creator side might have a problem, true, but this is usually ironed out if the life of the product is allowed to flounder and breath.
This is like the white privatization of Yezzi style over the decades. Surprised none of this cracker jacks is rocking shutter shades. All this shit so out of fashion, ain't nothing grimey such as like the way we live now. Ripped up T's white on white or black on black. That it to be lit. All this shit above is garbage.
This is like the white privatization of Yezzi style over the decades. Surprised none of this cracker jacks is rocking shutter shades. All this shit so out of fashion, ain't nothing grimey such as like the way we live now. Ripped up T's white on white or black on black. That it to be lit. All this shit above is garbage.
Man is a most complex simple creature: see what he weaves, and how base his reasons for doing so.
I had a dream last night where time travelers went back in time to change things and it ended up that two planet-spanning empires, the Watsonians and the Doylists, went to war for ten thousand years.
This is how it begins, isn't it? This is how it all starts. This is the beginning of the end.
Comments
There are some things that could be counted as plot holes if one is more nitpicky, or counted as details left to interpretation by the audience if one is less nitpicky.
But at the same time there is also a beauty in not knowing certain things, or certain things being left up to the audience's imagination -- and often, subsequent discussion and even arguments.
If something is left unexplained, then it may be due to things we don't know.
But if something appears to contradict another instance of itself, then we have a bigger problem.
um
it to be,
Well, actually, to be fair, there are some circumstances in which self-contradicting contexts could make sense. But they're pretty specific. Not something to be used without reason or by accident.
> eventually people will lose interest as there's no creative
strides being broken....
ugh why am i thinking of this as basically saying that only new things are entertaining
i don't like that implication
*twerks*
Edit: oh, it gets defense 6. lol