As a person who supports specificity in word usage and meaning, I support the use of "literally" to refer to a clarification that a description is not metaphorical but the component pieces are truly specifically present.
No, I think it's more like this. People use the words to establish the truth of something, that it actually happened. It then gets re-interpreted as a way to emphasize the truth of something, and from then to an intensifier.
Comments
It is one of my convictions.
It's so great to have a word that means what "literally" means. Physical, true, real, not metaphorical in any way.
Literally is my word, and you can't have it.
(The other Jane)
However, if "literally" doesn't mean what it used to mean then I wonder what word I should use if I wish to invoke the old meaning.
(The other Jane)
What shall we do if we can't use very in its original sense anymore?
(The other Jane)
Similarly: really, truly....
(The other Jane)
I live now, and Literally is my word, and you can't have it.
(The other Jane)
(The other Jane)
negative thought enters your mind and you acknowledge it
and then you remove it from your world
(The other Jane)