Man is a most complex simple creature: see what he weaves, and how base his reasons for doing so.
Well, yes. That's what capitalism does for you.
But "the more useful you are, the lower your status" statement isn't actually true. There are classes of people with very specialized, very useful skills, who are also very highly valued by society. Your doctors, architects, and so on. Think about it for a moment.
FYI, if you were to remove all the politicians in the world from existence, others would just take their place spontaneously. Politics is borne out of a desire to influence events greater than oneself, by organizing other people to join oneself in supporting that objective. This is incidentally the source for a lot of these sorts of leadership roles.
but it has to be said that some people makes millions of dollars more than some people, and it's startling to think they're doing a million times worth more work.
Also, there's school, wherein to learn the skills and tool sets to make money is barred.... by a barrier of money.
People with money will always have easier access to making more money, and people with no money have to struggle with what money they have to try and make more money and simultaneously live.
Man is a most complex simple creature: see what he weaves, and how base his reasons for doing so.
Sure, society stratification is blatantly unfair and changing your lot is all but impossible to some.
But it just doesn't work in a simple, reductionist method where the people with the "least use" are the most valued and the people with the "most use" are the least valued, because then we'd actually just idolize murderers and arsonists and all builders, carers, and teachers would comprise our untouchable castes.
Because I can't think of anybody with "less use" than the people who act to eliminate such things.
i kind of doubt anyone was trying to suggest that uselessness is valued in and of itself, only that there are people who don't do a lot who get a lot more money and respect than the people without whom society would fall apart.
Politics is borne out of a desire to influence events greater than oneself, by organizing other people to join oneself in supporting that objective.
In theory; in practice becoming a politician is a lucrative career path that's generally open to a privileged few, and so politics as it stands is rife with short-termism, mudslinging and corruption and not particularly concerned with the running of the country.
That's its source. The path from the source to the result is, of course, fraught with lots of unsightly details. Sometimes the result can be quite different from what the source imagined.
Comments
that's the only possible exception that springs to mind here though
if you're at the top you get lazy
at the top you've got bazillionaire CEOs who don't do shit other than ruin our favorite cartoons.
But then, a society where the only work that got done was specialized, skilled work would fall apart anyway.
And on the other hand we have politicians who will dismiss the expertise of experienced professionals whenever it suits them.
i don't really value politicians but they have money and status so i guess somebody must value them?
(The other Jane)
(Also, I have tried to rest my very political mind for a while)
Do note that there are also some costs associated with rank. For example, higher expectations placed on oneself by others.