ep 1: Disney Animated Classics ep 2: Jackson Pollock ep 3: all video games ever ep 4: Sabon ep 5: Adventure Time ep 6: Summer Wars ep 7: Piet Mondrian ep 8: BBC Radio 3 ep 9: Gotham ep 10: Seamus Heaney ep 11: college rock ep 12: Shasta McNasty
imo 'art' is a culturally defined category and if we can't allow for prescriptive definitions of art then we end up throwing out the idea that creative works can be valued, which is dangerously close to saying that all creative works are literally the same.
Most artists would disagree with that, in my experience.
Though I think the actual working definition is that anything the art world has ever considered art is art, regardless of one's opinion of its quality. So the prescriptiveness is really about who is considered able to do that.
I think the problem is that critics want to elevate their status as more important than artists', and cast themselves as kingmakers. It's not really about the academic aspect, it's more about critics using and abusing their power.
As someone who is on both sides of the fence but not in any serious capacity, I think it's an issue of mutual disrespect.
Critics think that what they have to say is always correct and important, Artists think that what critics have to say is never correct or important, to massively oversimplify the issue.
In my experience artists seem equally hostile towards the views of critics and the theories of academics. It's the latter that interest me more, although i feel that the former do a useful thing.
Comments
ep 1: Disney Animated Classics
ep 2: Jackson Pollock
ep 3: all video games ever
ep 4: Sabon
ep 5: Adventure Time
ep 6: Summer Wars
ep 7: Piet Mondrian
ep 8: BBC Radio 3
ep 9: Gotham
ep 10: Seamus Heaney
ep 11: college rock
ep 12: Shasta McNasty
Which i guess is not suprising.