I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
nuh-uh, there's a difference between a channel and a network
I always defined it as a network having affiliate stations and a channel (e.g. a cable channel) not having such, but I guess the individual cable systems are affiliates (and are even officially referred to as such)
Most people don't care about the distinction because it's only relevant to local channels and not national ones and most people don't consider the difference anyway.
But honestly, I don't remember much about either, aside from the fact that The CW was pretty try-hard.
I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
I always felt weird that we were supposed to consider UPN a real network when its Denver affiliate, KTVD, didn't even have a news department and was clearly run on a lower budget than its more reputable counterparts. Even the WB station, KWGN, had a news department (that well predated the network; however, it was merged with Fox affiliate KDVR's news department in 2009)
If you don't like the programming, don't watch it. That's all I can say. Everything else is fluff, and while there's no shame in being interested in that fluff from a technical perspective... it's still fluff.
nuh-uh, there's a difference between a channel and a network
I always defined it as a network having affiliate stations and a channel (e.g. a cable channel) not having such, but I guess the individual cable systems are affiliates (and are even officially referred to as such)
By that logic, Cartoon Network isn't a network at all!
I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
I admit, I don't know. I thought you were saying that the notion of CN being a "lie" was stupid, honestly, not the "network"/"channel" distinction I was trying to guess was a thing.
^^ I meant the former, but nitpicking about the latter is unfair because of the former, if you get what I mean. Networks operate channels, but a network may operate over one nationally uniform channel, and it's easy to mix those up.
personally I think it's weird how television channels are different than radio stations
if you're on an AM or Shortwave radio you can get really bad station bleed and it sounds like several are playing at once, as far as I know this does not happen with TVs and never has, even in the analog days where at worst you'd get "snow".
I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
I don't think any Denver stations were prone to interference because of the sheer size of the market terrain-wise; this was't like New York and, depending on location, Philadelphia or Hartford, or Washington and Baltimore, or Cleveland and Pittsburgh.
personally I think it's weird how television channels are different than radio stations
if you're on an AM or Shortwave radio you can get really bad station bleed and it sounds like several are playing at once, as far as I know this does not happen with TVs and never has, even in the analog days where at worst you'd get "snow".
Comments
Well, technically, they were channels.
if you're on an AM or Shortwave radio you can get really bad station bleed and it sounds like several are playing at once, as far as I know this does not happen with TVs and never has, even in the analog days where at worst you'd get "snow".