I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
It's more like "it was 1994 and they didn't give a shit about making the names on closing logos wieldy back then because nobody cared as much about branding":
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
But isn't putting the full subdivision name kind of... I dunno, is it a legal issue or something?
Time Warner is the master of unnecessary corporate bureaucracy. They once told a Cartoon Network artist he didn't have the rights to draw Superman alongside the Powerpuff Girls, despite owning both franchises.
So, yeah, I'd imagine there's some executive somewhere who demanded they use the full name of the subdivision.
I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
I remember seeing this logo at the end of reruns of Batman: The Animated Series and Animaniacs
It always felt like it wasn't supposed to be there; it had no music, faded in and out slower than other logos did, and it had that wordy name on top with the shield reading only "WARNER BROS."
The whole thing came off like some kind of afterthought
I've learned to tolerate drama...except on the boat
Warner Bros. Domestic Pay-TV Cable & Network Features Syndicated Distribution To Coaxial Wired Networks Oh Fuck Is This Actually The Division's Name Seriously
A Time Warner Entertainment Corporation, Incorporated Company
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
And yeah, that name just screams "someone with a Napoleon complex got handed that tiny division of WBTV, and nagged their boss until they got their own logo".
Comments
This Is Getting Into Movie Title Territory