Because they "market" autism as a debilitating mental illness when a large number of people with autism don't even want to be cured. They see Autism Speaks as unintentionally humiliating.
More people have said that and been killed than there are thorium decay products.
Elimination like killing? This is the first I've heard of that... :o Unless you mean eugenics, so people aren't born with autism in the first place. I might be a happier person without autism. but really, my point is basically w/e
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Even the name is kinda fucked up, when you think about it, because it implies that autistic people aren't able to speak for ourselves
"It is a matter of grave importance that Fairy tales should be respected.... Whosoever alters them to suit his own opinions, whatever they are, is guilty, to our thinking, of an act of presumption, and appropriates to himself what does not belong to him." -- Charles Dickens
I for one find the new "autism spectrum disorder" extremely confusing. I learned psychology from the DSM-IV, and was under the impression that people with classic autism need care about as intense as people with Down Syndrome. It would be horrifically unkind to treat them the same as Aspies, who are bright people who find it hard to socialize.
Well, the point is that it's a continuum: Extreme cases of Asperger's syndrome can in fact be more debilitating than some mild forms of classic autism or other such disorders. This is rare, but it does happen; it is believed that this, rather than schizophrenia, is what got Louis Wain institutionalised.
I guess because it's considered a given manifestation or presentation of a broader underlying disorder/syndrome? If I'm not mistaken, I have seen the same thing in ICD descriptions of things like personality disorders: There are different subtypes or symptom presentations, but it's basically the same thing—APD and Hare-criteria psychopathy, for instance.
"It is a matter of grave importance that Fairy tales should be respected.... Whosoever alters them to suit his own opinions, whatever they are, is guilty, to our thinking, of an act of presumption, and appropriates to himself what does not belong to him." -- Charles Dickens
Well, the point is that it's a continuum: Extreme cases of Asperger's syndrome can in fact be more debilitating than some mild forms of classic autism or other such disorders. This is rare, but it does happen; it is believed that this, rather than schizophrenia, is what got Louis Wain institutionalised.
That's an interesting anecdote. But it still bothers me that "autism" is now officially a label for the entire continuum of people with disabilities socializing. It conflates people with high IQ and intellectual disability, people who can hold down jobs and those who will have to live as dependents, etc. Well-meaning people want to know to treat people with psychological problems, and having one label only equips laymen to treat Leigh and me like Tommy Westphall, or vice versa.
More people have said that and been killed than there are thorium decay products.
Laypeople? You mean the swarm of zombies that fill the streets and don't know their right hand from their left and reproduce like a hive and feed on the blood of the living? Laypeople can suck it. English wasn't invented for *them.* D:<
The reason that the change was made was that it was basically already impossible to distinguish the diagnosis of "high-functioning autism"(not in DSM-IV either, but a commonly used phrase) and the diagnosis of "Asperger Syndrome".
Furthermore, even previously nonverbal autistics have often been able to communicate and communicate well through things like the Internet.
"It is a matter of grave importance that Fairy tales should be respected.... Whosoever alters them to suit his own opinions, whatever they are, is guilty, to our thinking, of an act of presumption, and appropriates to himself what does not belong to him." -- Charles Dickens
"It is a matter of grave importance that Fairy tales should be respected.... Whosoever alters them to suit his own opinions, whatever they are, is guilty, to our thinking, of an act of presumption, and appropriates to himself what does not belong to him." -- Charles Dickens
And how do you learn to read and write if you never speak? Think back to the ages you were taught these two skills and ponder the difficulties.
"It is a matter of grave importance that Fairy tales should be respected.... Whosoever alters them to suit his own opinions, whatever they are, is guilty, to our thinking, of an act of presumption, and appropriates to himself what does not belong to him." -- Charles Dickens
The deaf communicate by sign language to the parents or teachers who try to teach them to read and write. How does the process work without communication by the learner?
^^ Try looking it up. The education of the severely autistic is by no means a small field. And lest we forget, being poor at communicating directly has nothing to do with intellect; many of these people, as socially impaired as they are, prove themselves to be extremely intelligent when given alternate means of communication.
Comments
Or something.
Assassin poems, Poems that shoot
guns. Poems that wrestle cops into alleys
and take their weapons leaving them dead
Also, most of the good leadership spots (possibly all of them) are taken up by neurotypicals
It's a false-front group. Essentially advocating the elimination of Autistics while pretending to speak for them in a helpful manner.
not sure what the reasoning behind this is, or what the implications are
i don't think laypeople are incapable of understanding that it's a continuum, though i suppose there's a lot of ignorance about
It strikes me as generalization for generalization's sake, and I for one find it hard to label myself as outright autistic
by that logic deaf-mutes can't write either.