Pagetopper: A story where A loud announcer and a lady of 46 years of age fight crime, the announcer being a ghost spirit and the lady being made out of iron.
Just Cause... and effect: A story where an internet forum full of crazy people start planning the heist of the crowned jewels, of which they buy an island and start a country apparently.
Starring: Brad Pitt as Mojave Music. Idris Elba as Tre. and Curtis Armstrong as Justice.
Maybe it was a little silly to inject 'super' into the title of all of the games on the Super Nintendo console.
I mean, It really reeks of laziness doesn't it?
Not even mentioning what they did with the Nintendo 64. It reminds me of those terrible fake ads in movies. "Buy Soda Soft Drink"
----
Also, I love Terminator 2 to death, but on second rewatch, I can't help but feel as though they needlessly complicated things just to get action set pieces, and maybe the kind of hinted message that technological advancement = bad kind of rubbed me the wrong way in this era we're in.
Would it be inhumane to reprogram dangerous Sociopaths to actually care about things and people?
On the one hand, you're altering a person at their most fundamental level(the brain), on the other hand, most societies would say you're doing a good thing.
I was thinking of maybe the treatment from A Clockwork Orange
which basically is a novel (and then a film) on the topic you're describing: is it ok to essentially brainwash criminals and/or otherwise make them incapable of committing crimes? Or, as the author Anthony Burgess put it: does God want the act of good or the intention of good?
I'm more at arms with how unempathetically people with high positions of government act and how little reprogramming criminals would do in a society that still fails to provide everyone basic standards of living.
I don't care about what God wants, we have as humans will define our society on sound logic and toast, and if you're a person that feels it's ok to brutally murder and kill someone, then that person should be removed from our society.
Whether this comes about through wacky science changing who you are or through a wall made of steel and bricks is up for debate.
The internal problem I face is that majority ruling is kind of a false pretense to begin with, crowds beckoned at first impulse make bad judges of character, and giving that kind of mass the ability to radically alter a person seems like a bad idea.
Also, off topic, but I think I will reject religion and references to religion on the basis that it is a terrible tool for instilling a morality.
Well, Mr. Burgess apparently had some religious leanings, but it's not a viewpoint I share.
I wish I had some answers for you, but in all honesty I gave up these questions years ago. Decided instead to focus on easier questions like "what is time?" and "what does it mean to exist?"
A society defined by toast could be quite appetizing, though.
I happened upon the theory of relativity while I was in middleschool.
mind you, It wasn't told to me, rather I questioned the ability of time to seemingly be fast(during periods of non-school) and slow(during periods of school)
ever since then, I have manipulated relativity to my benefit, making work breeze by and other times last as long as I want.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
I can't remember if AU and I actually passed by it when we were there, but at COSI they have a huge spirally dealy like that attached to one of the walls on the second floor, so you can stare at it for a few seconds then look down the hallway and everything looks weird and wobbly.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
I thought it looked cool. I would have gone on it if I weren't over the weight limit...
More people have said that and been killed than there are thorium decay products.
I dislike punitive attitudes; they are as if people have a moral obligation to repay crime with misery, pain, and/or death. It coincidentally happens that this is profitable, too. I understand discipline that a person voluntarily subjects their self to, in pursuit of a greater goal. I understand neutralizing immediate threats to people's safety and well-being. But I fervently hate moralism.
I've been trying to create a morality that functions on cold hard logic, so even people without the ability to feel emotions can follow it.
Sentience and Sapience aren't exactly common when viewing the scope of creatures on the planet, as these features can add more complexities to the structures within the systems they inhabit, they are valuable features.
Complexities are valuable for progress in the ways of thinking and understanding, our very being would likely not exist without this feature.
Any creature with valuable features is by proxy, valuable, thus the value of a human being is by measure greater than things by which human beings create, as things human beings create are accepted as percentages of what human beings are capable of given a large enough system.
See? Following logic, human beings are valuable resources, You don't need to use words like "feelings" or "emotions" or "moralizing" logic dictates you are valuable, and in the scope of things on the planet, you are valuable.
Comments
Starring:
Brad Pitt as Mojave Music.
Idris Elba as Tre.
and Curtis Armstrong as Justice.
Rated H for Heap.
Super Metroid does the same idea over 9000 times better
I mean, It really reeks of laziness doesn't it?
Not even mentioning what they did with the Nintendo 64. It reminds me of those terrible fake ads in movies. "Buy Soda Soft Drink"
----
Also, I love Terminator 2 to death, but on second rewatch, I can't help but feel as though they needlessly complicated things just to get action set pieces, and maybe the kind of hinted message that technological advancement = bad kind of rubbed me the wrong way in this era we're in.
I did think that Nintendo kinda got lazy with titles like "Super Sequel 64" etc.
Fabulous Metroid.
Fabulous Mario.
Fabulous Man.
wow, success sounds pretty great!
On the one hand, you're altering a person at their most fundamental level(the brain), on the other hand, most societies would say you're doing a good thing.
though I will admit that this point was achieved after various intrusive surgeries and experiments.
2001: A Space Hamlet.
2001: A Space Raven.
which basically is a novel (and then a film) on the topic you're describing: is it ok to essentially brainwash criminals and/or otherwise make them incapable of committing crimes? Or, as the author Anthony Burgess put it: does God want the act of good or the intention of good?
I don't care about what God wants, we have as humans will define our society on sound logic and toast, and if you're a person that feels it's ok to brutally murder and kill someone, then that person should be removed from our society.
Whether this comes about through wacky science changing who you are or through a wall made of steel and bricks is up for debate.
The internal problem I face is that majority ruling is kind of a false pretense to begin with, crowds beckoned at first impulse make bad judges of character, and giving that kind of mass the ability to radically alter a person seems like a bad idea.
Also, off topic, but I think I will reject religion and references to religion on the basis that it is a terrible tool for instilling a morality.
I wish I had some answers for you, but in all honesty I gave up these questions years ago. Decided instead to focus on easier questions like "what is time?" and "what does it mean to exist?"
A society defined by toast could be quite appetizing, though.
mind you, It wasn't told to me, rather I questioned the ability of time to seemingly be fast(during periods of non-school) and slow(during periods of school)
ever since then, I have manipulated relativity to my benefit, making work breeze by and other times last as long as I want.
but, it is true that our perception of time can be quite different depending on our situation
Basically, the short version, I am a Time-witch, original character, do not stael.
If you were a thousand years old, a day would be like a few seconds. Eh?
Sentience and Sapience aren't exactly common when viewing the scope of creatures on the planet, as these features can add more complexities to the structures within the systems they inhabit, they are valuable features.
Complexities are valuable for progress in the ways of thinking and understanding, our very being would likely not exist without this feature.
Any creature with valuable features is by proxy, valuable, thus the value of a human being is by measure greater than things by which human beings create, as things human beings create are accepted as percentages of what human beings are capable of given a large enough system.
See? Following logic, human beings are valuable resources, You don't need to use words like "feelings" or "emotions" or "moralizing" logic dictates you are valuable, and in the scope of things on the planet, you are valuable.
*hugs* :D
COMMENCE WEIRDNESS
you should maybe put an epilepsy warning before posting them though?
idk if anyone here has epilepsy, maybe it's not an issue