"It is a matter of grave importance that Fairy tales should be respected.... Whosoever alters them to suit his own opinions, whatever they are, is guilty, to our thinking, of an act of presumption, and appropriates to himself what does not belong to him." -- Charles Dickens
^ I can't recommend enough owning your primary residence to anyone who has the savings to buy when the market is bad. The taxes are actually very simple on your own residence. Additional houses interact with your federal income taxes, which is where all the complexity lies.
"It is a matter of grave importance that Fairy tales should be respected.... Whosoever alters them to suit his own opinions, whatever they are, is guilty, to our thinking, of an act of presumption, and appropriates to himself what does not belong to him." -- Charles Dickens
In fact, a weak economy often drives up demand for rented housing without increasing supply, so you can be better off buying low, selling high and moving to a rented home at the peak of the market.
"Unless I started owning more than one property and started renting, that is."
Bingo. :)
The opportunity costs of being a landlord are a disincentive for anyone earning high wages. Unless real estate becomes hands-down the best investment in its risk class, you really just want a house, as it beats paying rent in several ways.
"It is a matter of grave importance that Fairy tales should be respected.... Whosoever alters them to suit his own opinions, whatever they are, is guilty, to our thinking, of an act of presumption, and appropriates to himself what does not belong to him." -- Charles Dickens
"buying low, selling high and moving to a rented home at the peak of the market."
To follow up, doing the opposite is exactly what hurt so many Americans. They switched from being renters to loan-financed owners during a bubble.
On the plus side, it's thanks to the fact that the property market is so poor at the moment that we're able to rent our current home. Our landlord doesn't want to sell until the market improves else he'd be selling at a loss. Then again our landlord's full of shit.
Ace Rimmer said:Not necessarily. There are special government something-or-anothers that bring the tax down to 11% for poor people. Its still regressive as the middle class pay more than the upper class Kexruct said:
It just kind of bothers me that it's never even considered.
Because its political suicide?
And that's what I was wondering. Why is it political suicide?
Obviously because it's regressive, but why can't that just be fixed?
Not necessarily. I dunno, I just think that with the way things are making things work is more important than improving them. The current tax system is almost impossible to improve because of how ridiculously complicated it is.
Not necessarily. I dunno, I just think that with the way things are making things work is more important than improving them. The current tax system is almost impossible to improve because of how ridiculously complicated it is.
The reason the tax system is complicated is because morally ambiguous accountants believe its okay to tax avoid and this gives us honest accountants a bad name
Comments
i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
i get so angry sometimes i just punch plankton --Klinotaxis
"Unless I started owning more than one property and started renting, that is."
Bingo. :)
The opportunity costs of being a landlord are a disincentive for anyone earning high wages. Unless real estate becomes hands-down the best investment in its risk class, you really just want a house, as it beats paying rent in several ways.
To follow up, doing the opposite is exactly what hurt so many Americans. They switched from being renters to loan-financed owners during a bubble.
Its still regressive as the middle class pay more than the upper class
Kexruct said:
It just kind of bothers me that it's never even considered.
Because its political suicide?
And that's what I was wondering. Why is it political suicide?
not reverse christmas