you think Bill Gates is good for giving away money, but actually he has lots of money, the goodness of charity is scientifically determined by a ratio of your total money versus the amount of money you give
you think Bill Gates is good for giving away money, but actually he has lots of money, the goodness of charity is scientifically determined by a ratio of your total money versus the amount of money you give
virtue
signalling
He's using his evil vaccines to pollute the children of Africa with autism to create the clerk class for the new world order.
you think Bill Gates is good for giving away money, but actually he has lots of money, the goodness of charity is scientifically determined by a ratio of your total money versus the amount of money you give
Then he sat down opposite the offering box, and watched the crowd putting coins into it. Many rich people were throwing in large amounts. And a poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, worth less than a penny. He called his disciples and said to them, “I tell you the truth, this poor widow has put more into the offering box than all the others. For they all gave out of their wealth. But she, out of her poverty, put in what she had to live on, everything she had.”
i'm generally skeptical of the value and values of corporate activism but it 100% owned when starbucks pledged to hire 10000 refugees, someone asked why not 10000 veterans, and the response was "lol we started that in 2013 and we're most of the way there"
you think Bill Gates is good for giving away money, but actually he has lots of money, the goodness of charity is scientifically determined by a ratio of your total money versus the amount of money you give
virtue
signalling
Obviously I'm not gonna call anybody out for philanthropy, but the ratio thing is actually an interesting point, since there have been quite a few studies that show that rich people generally donate a smaller percentage of their money to charity than poorer people do.
Comments
virtue
signalling
(i am a little mad)