i mean, consequentialism makes sense to me in a similar way, but if i was evaluating someone's actions i'd want to know their motives, because that's more helpful for guessing their future behavior
also, i think brains are basically wet computers and we'd be a lot smarter if we'd overclock them
i mean, consequentialism makes sense to me in a similar way, but if i was evaluating someone's actions i'd want to know their motives, because that's more helpful for guessing their future behavior
also, i think brains are basically wet computers and we'd be a lot smarter if we'd overclock them
see the last line is supposed to be a self deprecating jab, because i'm talking about this ethics stuff i have very little knowledge of, and when people do that about something i do know about, i get mad
The doctrine that the morality of an action is solely determined by the actor’s motive rests on a significant assumption: that the good always know what their motives are, and are never moved to do things for selfish reasons while yet thinking themselves moved by virtue
I remember reading this essay, but I remember literally nothing about it, save an involuntary feeling of smug vindication because the number one person I associate enders game with in my head was this one dude I was in middle/high school with who was a total dipshit
Comments
i mean, consequentialism makes sense to me in a similar way, but if i was evaluating someone's actions i'd want to know their motives, because that's more helpful for guessing their future behavior
also, i think brains are basically wet computers and we'd be a lot smarter if we'd overclock them