I don't think most people think of terrain as exciting/boring.
I can think of a couple kinds of people who do, topography entusiasts (extant, but few and far between), people who make world maps for RPGs (not talking about real places anyway), and landscape painters (fair enough I guess).
I don't know what I'm getting at with this post. Someone finish my thought for me.
i like hilly landscapes and i guess i'd feel a bit exposed out somewhere with flat plains as far as the eye can see
'flat terrain is bad' feels a bit oversimplifying, also i guess i'd tend to think more in terms of 'mountains are cool' or 'hills are pretty' rather than the negative
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
This is the state I grew up in:
So...yeah. In my mind, flatness is the default. Mountains and hills, when I encounter them, are a bonus.
Flat is fine as long as it's broken up with a variety of stuff on top of the flat. It's just when everything is samey looking that it's boring and unpleasant.
Flat is fine as long as it's broken up with a variety of stuff on top of the flat. It's just when everything is samey looking that it's boring and unpleasant.
This, mostly.
I still prefer hills. Flat places tend to give me the sensation of going nowhere, even if they make walking less difficult.
Comments
Kinda boring I guess, if you judge terrain by topographic interest. Which I do all the time, your moral worth is fixed by STRM30_PLUS.
Assassin poems, Poems that shoot
guns. Poems that wrestle cops into alleys
and take their weapons leaving them dead
'flat terrain is bad' feels a bit oversimplifying, also i guess i'd tend to think more in terms of 'mountains are cool' or 'hills are pretty' rather than the negative
This is the only time I like anything flat
This, mostly.
I still prefer hills. Flat places tend to give me the sensation of going nowhere, even if they make walking less difficult.