I admit I don't get why people were so upset by "Sabotage" being in the Star Trek 3 trailer when it was already featured so prominently in the first film.
I admit I don't get why people were so upset by "Sabotage" being in the Star Trek 3 trailer when it was already featured so prominently in the first film.
I think the difference is that in Star Trek 1, it was a mark of Kirk's rambunctious childhood, whereas in Star Trek 3, it's casting a shadow over the whole movie that feels very un-Star Trek to many people.
I admit I don't get why people were so upset by "Sabotage" being in the Star Trek 3 trailer when it was already featured so prominently in the first film.
I think the difference is that in Star Trek 1, it was a mark of Kirk's rambunctious childhood, whereas in Star Trek 3, it's casting a shadow over the whole movie that feels very un-Star Trek to many people.
Comments
Thanks.