You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
Tre:Weren't they made in the late 90's? Maybe the last few movies would of taken place in the early days of the cell phone.
...The only huge complaint I've ever had about the movies is how they keep wearing muggle clothes at Hogwarts. During classes. What happened to the robes they used to wear all the time? :/
I am curious about Pottermore and should probably check it out.
>10/11 (can't remember which) year olds
Hogwarts' First Year corresponds to the UK Y7, which is children aged 11-12. Harry has his eleventh birthday at the start of book 1 and his twelfth birthday at the start of book 2.
>Wait, were the movies supposed to be set in the 90's as well?
They can't be, the Millenium Dome and the London Eye are plainly visible in at least one of them, neither of which existed until the very end of the 1990s.
You are the end result of a “would you push the button” prompt where the prompt was “you have unlimited godlike powers but you appear to all and sundry to be an impetuous child” – Zero, 2022
I feel weird in that I read all 7 books but didn't bother with the last two movies.
In the books I remember the robes are actually supposed to look a bit like dresses. In the films IIRC they just wear regular school uniforms only with cloaks around the shoulders (and sometimes pointy hats).
^^ I'm pretty sure they were deliberate, since they are very visible.
Rowling is very inconsistent about dates in the books anyway so I don't think it matters.
I agree with squid that it's a good series (although my favourite book was bizarrely the fifth one; I don't know if I'd feel the same way if I were to reread them. I greatly disliked the fifth film).
^ I was disappointed that they omitted Snape's challenge, though it probably wouldn't have been very cinematic.
I wonder what Stuck would be renamed to if it had to be?
I mean, "Tre's Mall Adventure" might be a bit generic, but it fits, I guess. "The Life and Times of Tre" could also work as a name for the entire series, but then again it sort of reminds me of something else so maybe not.
Also, I read a book about Nick Flamel once. YNTKT.
Comments
...Eh, if a group of 10/11 (can't remember which) year olds can knock one out, I'm sure the prefects should be okay. :P
Tre:Weren't they made in the late 90's? Maybe the last few movies would of taken place in the early days of the cell phone.
...The only huge complaint I've ever had about the movies is how they keep wearing muggle clothes at Hogwarts. During classes. What happened to the robes they used to wear all the time? :/
>10/11 (can't remember which) year olds
Hogwarts' First Year corresponds to the UK Y7, which is children aged 11-12. Harry has his eleventh birthday at the start of book 1 and his twelfth birthday at the start of book 2.
>Wait, were the movies supposed to be set in the 90's as well?
They can't be, the Millenium Dome and the London Eye are plainly visible in at least one of them, neither of which existed until the very end of the 1990s.
^^ I'm pretty sure they were deliberate, since they are very visible.
Rowling is very inconsistent about dates in the books anyway so I don't think it matters.
OKAY.
GONNA WATCH THE REST OF THE TRG MARIO PARTY 2 LP NOW.
*Avoids the comments, chants "let Tim win" repeatedly*
^ I was disappointed that they omitted Snape's challenge, though it probably wouldn't have been very cinematic.
The legend of the Philosopher's Stone was of great interest to a lot of alchemists back then.
Sorry, what are we talking about?
I was a teenage wizard.
Legally Harry.
and other such spinoffs.
(go tim)
Tell me, with a voice, and a wish.
Does that answer your question?
The third Robin is meh.
Clock:Yes. That does answer my question. :P