Kantnedaaaaa

Odradek

Objectivity and stability derive solely from the categories; the realm of

things in themselves is without categories; yet it is something for itself

and for ref ection. The only idea we can form of this realm is like that of

the iron king in the fairy tale whom a human self-consciousness permeates

with the veins of objectivity so that he can stand erect. But then formal

transcendental idealism sucks these veins out of the king so that the

upright shape collapses and becomes something in between form and

lump, repulsive to look at. For the cognition of nature, without the veins

injected into nature by self-consciousness, there remains nothing but

sensation. In this way, then, the objectivity of the categories in experience

and the necessity of these relations become once more something

contingent and subjective

Klinotaxis

MY LEGACY'S NOT DOING WHAT I TELL IT TO, KANTNEDA

Sredni Vashtar

I find it funny how people tend to reference Akira reasonably often yet never really discuss it.

I loved it, personally.

Tachyon

So did I.

my brother hated it.

Odradek

I read the manga, but did not finish it for some reason.

Odradek

Also I spent a disproportionate amount of time editing a picture for a joke I knew maybe three people would respond to.

Odradek

"Now that Hegelianism has tarried with the negative of poststructuralist/feminist/etc. critique, it can preserve what is most valuable in those critiques while sloughing off its negative image (negation of negation) and resume its dominance of the philosophical field, at once chastened and strengthened by its encounter with the other.

In other words: for Hegelians to claim to be in a position to “incorporate” the critiques and move forward is exactly what people distrust about Hegel."

Odradek